Fair points, JG was 90% on Neale most of first quarter in general play, not fussed and agree about centre bounce set ups but Neale first goal was coz he got away and goal side of JG and Hardwicks assignment for JackG would have been to shadow and harass Neale and Zorko and to let Prestia and Shedds to have less responsibility and more firepower which worked treat.
Agree Jacks relentless pressure is very good BUT WITH getting it 14 times with no goals, no goal assists, no clearances, below average metres gained for a mid and 5 clangers...Simpson or Scott won't be losing any sleep over him. They won't be losing sleep over Ellis either of course, but to say Ellis played a woeful game but Jack was awesome annoys me. Jacks lack of pace minding class mids is just as much a concern to me as the Ellis lack of toughness....Thought they were both well below par in their roles. And both were terrible early but ok after that.
With due respect why do you just make things up? You think we can't review these things. Here I'll list you some facts. The facts show that in the first quarter Jack Graham, in 23 ball ups and throw ins I reviewed, he only stood on Neale in ONE of those. You are correct the goal that Neale kicked was when Graham stood on him at a ball up, however it's mildly ironic and amusing, considering you're trying to use an argument against Jack's game to defend Ellis, that the reason he got the opportunity was that Ellis fumbled a handball receive from Baker who won the clearance. So here are the results as I found them:
20 minutes on the clock: #1 ballup or throwin: Prestia is on Neale
19: #2,#3,#4: Prestia
18: #5,#6: Prestia
17: #7: Cotchin
15: #8: Neale wasn't there
14: #9: Neale wasn't there
14: #10: Edwards
13: #11: Edwards - this is where I see Graham for the first time - so on the bench for the first 30% of the quarter
12: #12: Edwards - Graham is marking Robinson
11 - Graham disposal Zac Bailey is chasing him down the field
9: #13: Edwards
9: #14: Prestia
7: #15 Broad
5: #16: Neale is forward on Baker
5: #17: Graham - Neale kicks goal
5: #18: Neale is forward on Baker
4: #19, #20: Neale is forward on Baker
2: #21: Edwards
0: #22: Prestia
0: #23: Bolton
So yes if 1 time on Neale represents 90% of the 1st quarter (even though Graham didn't come on till 13-14 left on the clock) you are correct Graham did a terrible job not containing his 8 disposal 1 goal first quarter. The goal Neale kicked was a result of us turning it over, it was a bit of luck and good play for Neale, not much Graham could have done about that one, but always easy to explain how he may have in hindsight.
Please just be realistic. Don't make things up to try and prove an argument. Most pundits think Jack Graham played very well. I am sure the coach was very happy with his output. His role was not to get clearances, his role was to pressure and harass and build the perceived pressure and that he did with 86 pressure act points and 8 tackles. Anything else he achieves is a bonus. 5 clangers included 3 frees against by the way. 1st one the guy ducked into him (or slipped), nothing he could do about it. 2nd one was probably there, in the back in a marking contest. Can't remember the 3rd one. How many of Graham's pressure acts that caused turnovers and a score to the Tigers would have been counted in his score assists? I predict none.