Sintiger said:I agree.
I would give him another year. Been consistently good at vfl level.
spook said:His contract is up at the end of the year. I think he'll walk.
nikolasmia said:Lennon was shopped last year in a very public way.
Nobody in the league wanted him.
Lennon won't walk at the end of the year, he will be delisted, no body will want him again.
He just doesn't have enough AFL traits.
saigon tiger said:In the minority but Im still a fan. Ffs we dont just throw away a first rounder!
Tigers of Old said:On the back of his 4 goals in the VFL there's been quite a few calls around for him to come into the side but I can't see it happening.
His game wasn't that flash on the weekend despite the small bag of goals.
Athletic traits still remain an issue. Also looked very proppy in the game.
leon said:Well no use playing a guy at AFL level if he's not near 100% fit, but I'd like to see him replace Castagna at some point and given a game or three. The dilemma of choosing a player who can get it more but only convert poorly, or his opposite, who is not as athletic but kicks for goal very capably.
lamb22 said:Kicking for goal thread. "Woe is us, we cant kick, how can we fix it?"
Ben Lennon thread "Can't play him forward , liability, too slow"
Disconnect unnoticed.
Tigers of Old said:Chicken/egg lamby. Gotta get shots at goal to kick them. Ben's had trouble doing that lately at senior level.
This has to be worth a look. Our kicking for goal has cost us dearly this season and Lennon knows where the goals are and is pretty good overhead. He'd need to work a lot harder than he has previously to apply the all important forward defensive pressure....but as a high pick, should be given one last shot at it. At least we know he wont try and pass it off from 30 metrs out like some did last week.TT33 said:How about a slightly radical approach, Ben at full forward & Jack centre half forward.
Didn't someone post that McCrae said Benny was more of a lead up type. He's a good mark & a straight kick. It might be worth a try.