Politeness is for schmucks.Philosophy/religion and debate is much more interesting bloodied and bare fisted.Djevv said:Personally I don't think your philosophy stuff makes a lot of sense either. But I'm polite enough not to mention it.
I invite you to do your worst. Thats why I put it 'out there.'
Hmm ok.Must admit I've never seen it described quite like that.OK I am not a Physicist, so this is my laymans take on it. Since you have all of space-time originating at an impossiblility -a dimensionless point - a singularity - I think that existance from non-existance is a reasonable way to say it. Nothing, not time, not space, not matter existed prior to this event - in other words there was not even a 'before'. Weird eh?
From here. '"three British astrophysicists, Steven Hawking, George Ellis, and Roger Penrose turned their attention to the Theory of Relativity and its implications regarding our notions of time. In 1968 and 1970, they published papers in which they extended Einstein's Theory of General Relativity to include measurements of time and space.1, 2 According to their calculations, time and space had a finite beginning that corresponded to the origin of matter and energy."3 The singularity didn't appear in space; rather, space began inside of the singularity. Prior to the singularity, nothing existed, not space, time, matter, or energy - nothing. So where and in what did the singularity appear if not in space? We don't know. We don't know where it came from, why it's here, or even where it is. All we really know is that we are inside of it and at one time it didn't exist and neither did we.'
I've done some reading on this topic, but I am always prepared to do more .