In depth article by left wing journos. Scheerpost who funds that ?.The Show Trial against Julian Assange
How US and British authorities are bending the law and undermining press freedomscheerpost.com
No one. The way journalism should be.In depth article by left wing journos. Scheerpost who funds that ?.
100% this ^^^No one. The way journalism should be.
Chelsea went to the knick & Julian his partner in the crime.In any case, what did Assange expose? Assange exposed what governments are doing. These are supposed to be democratic governments, you know, governments who act in the name of their citizens. Surely the citizens have a right to know what is being done in our names?
DS
Chelsea went to the knick & Julian his partner in the crime.
Dude yawn !! Manning charged with 22 offences under Espionage Act 1917. Pled guilty to 10 & was found guilty in some of the others. Assange of Wikileaks instead of reporting the fact Chelsea darling had provided him with US Defence Security material big noted himself by getting into bed with Chelsea & publishing it through his Wikileaks portal. A responsible owner/editor would have reported the fact Chelsea was violating US Defence classified material when not authorised to do so. Julian was all about Me Me Me.Dude, you really have no idea what you are talking about... again.
Manning was a whistleblower, they gave facts to Wikileaks (an online platform).
Assange was the founder of Wikileaks.
Do you have any idea how Wikileaks (the online platform) functions? As in, how it literally works?
No Governments work for the citizens they all work for the people who own and control them.In any case, what did Assange expose? Assange exposed what governments are doing. These are supposed to be democratic governments, you know, governments who act in the name of their citizens. Surely the citizens have a right to know what is being done in our names?
DS
I'll try again... Do you know the basis on the functioning of Wikileaks?Dude yawn !! Manning charged with 22 offences under Espionage Act 1917. Pled guilty to 10 & was found guilty in some of the others. Assange of Wikileaks instead of reporting the fact Chelsea darling had provided him with US Defence Security material big noted himself by getting into bed with Chelsea & publishing it through his Wikileaks portal. A responsible owner/editor would have reported the fact Chelsea was violating US Defence classified material when not authorised to do so. Julian was all about Me Me Me.
May be cutting off Tigaman's indepth reply on the workings of Wikileaks... but yes, anonymous individuals upload information through the website; and you can be sure the individuals doing so would be using multiple layers of IP and identity blockers such as VPNs and using TOR browser.My understanding is that wikileaks gets info anonymously.
DS
The Assange case is about the US of A Classified documents published under Assange's watch as editor It has nothing to do about how Wikileaks functions. I know how how Wikileaks operates under the The Sunshine Press banner funded by only God knows who.I'll try again... Do you know the basis on the functioning of Wikileaks?
So, how does it all work?The Assange case is about the US of A Classified documents published under Assange's watch as editor It has nothing to do about how Wikileaks functions. I know how how Wikileaks operates under the The Sunshine Press banner funded by only God knows who.
So, how does it all work?
If you answer this, you will see that Assange is 'usually' quite hands off, not that you will ever admit to it as it doesn't suit your agenda.