Jack said on Thursday that mini hadn't changed much. Maybe the structure of some of the meetings. He felt the boys had been freed up a bit and that Dimma said that he couldn't motivate us anymore and that he felt someone else could. A new voice and all.
If Jack is being straight then is this free and easy feeling the players have sustainable? History says no. Ask any of the players who played under Jeff Gieschen. I vividly remember the Flea explaining how it started off great but by the end the players called him the quiche because "he was light and fluffy but if you had too much of him he made you sick."
Rhyce Shaw did the classic interim coach thing at North. As interim coach he freed them up, don't be afraid to take risks, no recriminations, back to basics footy and the players loved him. He gets appointed senior coach and the players turn up to pre-season with the whiteboard filled with new rules and gameplans which he was going to implement. Turns out his gameplan or his ability to teach it or both weren't up to it and it fell apart pretty quickly.
This is my fear with Mini. I would much rather he came in and changed things up a bit. Introduced a few of his own philosophies so we could see what he has actually got, what his footy philosophies are. I'd love the players to be talking about the things he's introduced rather than saying nothing has changed.
All the feel good stuff is great in the short term but what happens long term?