AFL Betting Thread

[tigertim]

Haven’t thought we’d lose a game all year, think this week we might.

Saints a massive show @ $3.90 against Freo ILO.

Losing Days is on fire!

 

[tigerman]

Got a couple of good multi's going, now for the hard part, i need the Pies to win on one and Cronulla on the other.

One out of Two aint bad.

 

[spook]

hope I didnt shake your resolve?

good punting

Certainly not, mate. Just felt it would be a kick either way.

 

[easy_tiger]

Ive got JG for the RS @ $8
Tigers highest vic side after H&A @$5 ;D
Tigers V GWS gf quin @$50 (cant help but grin whenever I even think about that bet) ???
Tigers to beat Crows R2 @ $3
Tigers on top R4 @$6
Tigers on top R8 @$5 :rofl

click goes the ratchet boys, click, click, click.

 

[tigerman]

I reckon the Lions are sneaky chance at $2.90 against the Hawks. It's at the Gabba, Hodge and Fagan might just have enough good oil on the Hawks to cause an upset.

 

[MD Jazz]

I reckon the Lions are sneaky chance at $2.90 against the Hawks. It's at the Gabba, Hodge and Fagan might just have enough good oil on the Hawks to cause an upset.

I agree. Hawks are vulnerable away.

Good betting round with almost every underdog a chance.

 

[spook]

$1.60 (Betfair) for North to beat GWRabble at their Hobart fortress (14-2 record) is surely a misprint.

 

[MD Jazz]

I think the bulldogs will beat the crows tonight. The line bet is a special. Bulldogs got their best side of year in and just about and crows their worst.

 

[MD Jazz]

Bevo should be asked why the bulldogs played dry weather football on a wet night. What a *smile* coach and dumb playing group. They are a shadow of the side that won the flag.

Will steer clear of them

 

[spook]

$1.60 (Betfair) for North to beat GWRabble at their Hobart fortress (14-2 record) is surely a misprint.

Easy money.

Bevo should be asked why the bulldogs played dry weather football on a wet night. What a sh!te coach and dumb playing group. They are a shadow of the side that won the flag.

Will steer clear of them

Dumb bet, MD, no offence. Adelaide 2.5 years older per man and playing at home. Dogs had no chance.

 

[Leysy Days]

Yeah Roos were morals.

 

[tigerman]

I agree. Hawks are vulnerable away.

Good betting round with almost every underdog a chance.

While not as good as the $2.90 for the Lions to beat the Hawks, At $2.10 the Roos to beat the Dockers is a pretty good bet.

 

[MD Jazz]

While not as good as the $2.90 for the Lions to beat the Hawks, At $2.10 the Roos to beat the Dockers is a pretty good bet.

Not sure on that, its a tough trip to the west.

Reckon the lions will go close against the swans.

 

[MD Jazz]

Easy money.
Dumb bet, MD, no offence. Adelaide 2.5 years older per man and playing at home. Dogs had no chance.

I liked the inclusions of Wood & Roughead and Adelaide lost McGovern, Walker, Crouch. In the end, given the conditions the changes probably favoured the crows.

But they should have covered the line. Having 186 handballs to the crows 96 in those conditions was staggering. Bevo should be punched in the head. Yet they still led the i50's. Problem was they got it there too slowly.

I keep thinking the dogs are OK despite all evidence the contrary.

 

[spook]

Post-posting I know, but I was away down at Port Fairy (awesome links course btw) for the weekend. Loaded up on the Pies H2H @ $1.42 on Friday, put the profits on St Kilda +44.5 against us, then reinvested on the Unders (166.5) in the GWS-Essendon game.

As with easy, I'm invested in the Richmond-GWS quinella, which isn't looking flash, but as Jack says, never cash out. Instead I've looked for value elsewhere: Over the past few weeks I've taken a slice of Richmond-Collingwood at $88, Richmond-Melbourne at 40s, Richmond-West Coast at 20s and Melbourne-West Coast at $32.

 

[easy_tiger]

As with easy, I'm invested in the Richmond-GWS quinella, which isn't looking flash, but as Jack says, never cash out. Instead I've looked for value elsewhere: Over the past few weeks I've taken a slice of Richmond-Collingwood at $88, Richmond-Melbourne at 40s, Richmond-West Coast at 20s and Melbourne-West Coast at $32.

The only cash-out facility i have is throwing the ticket in the fire, and getting a brief flare of light.

Which I'll do in a couple of weeks.

Still, the day dreams of paying off my mortgage where worth the outlay

Theres heaps more expensive fantasys out there.

I think the GF will come out of tigers, wc, crows, swans.

The rest are pretending IMHO.

Im gonna buy some cheaper fantasy on the Cotchy/tiger double

 

[tigerman]

As with easy, I'm invested in the Richmond-GWS quinella, which isn't looking flash, but as Jack says, never cash out. Instead I've looked for value elsewhere: Over the past few weeks I've taken a slice of Richmond-Collingwood at $88, Richmond-Melbourne at 40s, Richmond-West Coast at 20s and Melbourne-West Coast at $32.

I like it spook, i've done the same, i've got Richmond/Pies, Richmond/North, Richmond/Melbourne.

 

[tigerman]

While not as good as the $2.90 for the Lions to beat the Hawks, At $2.10 the Roos to beat the Dockers is a pretty good bet.

If i was a punting man i'd put on a Multi including the Bombers at $3.55

 

[spook]

Okay, this time last year we got an easy $3.65 for Gold Coast to roll the Cats at home, which they duly did. Some big ins for the Suns (Lynch, Day, Martin) and the Cats can't score. $3.40 this year, get on. Generous +22.5-point start too, I'll save on that.

 

[spook]

I've been picking off some short-priced certainties and there's another this week. 29% interest for North to beat Brisbane, and almost even money to make it 4 goals +.