911 Truth Movement

[KnightersRevenge]

where's the plane guys? If it was a plane the remains would be splattered everywhere.

These are some of the photos from Rosy's post a few pages ago, I assume you didn't click the link as you don't seem to have seen them. I haven't posted the photos of bodies, they're pretty gut wrenching.

Most planes wreck when attempting to land these ones were trying obliterate themselves, why would you expect the wreckage to look the same?

 

[tigertim]

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html

I wonder what tese people think about the idea that no plane hit the Pentagon.


And I reckon the family members of these dead people who "weren't" on that plane might be a bit offended that some bozo in Melbourne reckons their loved ones weren't killed.
http://911blogger.com/node/17418

 

[Harry]

These are some of the photos from Rosy's post a few pages ago, I assume you didn't click the link as you don't seem to have seen them. I haven't posted the photos of bodies, they're pretty gut wrenching.

Most planes wreck when attempting to land these ones were trying obliterate themselves, why would you expect the wreckage to look the same?

lol - 3 pictures of that circular looking thing and that tin with the C on it again.

where's the rest of the plane?

 

[Harry]

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html

I wonder what tese people think about the idea that no plane hit the Pentagon.

there's eyewitnesses that saw grey planes, and that heard explosions. there's eyewitnesses that have seen aliens. until these testify in a court of law then that's all they are, supposed witnesses. so do you believe the grey plane and explosion witnesses?

And I reckon the family members of these dead people who "weren't" on that plane might be a bit offended that some bozo in Melbourne reckons their loved ones weren't killed.
http://911blogger.com/node/17418

Speak to the family and friends for 911 truth who are offended by bozo's like you who persist with and propagate the official lies and cover up and help jeopardise their right to a fair and independent trial for the murder of their loved ones.

 

[Harry]

these ones were trying obliterate themselves,

so the hijacker managed to hit his target at full speed flying 5 meters off the ground? many experienced pilots dispute this claim.

 

[Harry]

These are some of the photos from Rosy's post a few pages ago, I assume you didn't click the link as you don't seem to have seen them. I haven't posted the photos of bodies, they're pretty gut wrenching.

Most planes wreck when attempting to land these ones were trying obliterate themselves, why would you expect the wreckage to look the same?

there are aircraft experts that claim these round things aren't from a plane.

 

[Baloo]

so the hijacker managed to hit his target at full speed flying 5 meters off the ground? many experienced pilots dispute this claim.

Yeah but you get bozos everywhere.

 

[tigertim]

there's eyewitnesses that saw grey planes, and that heard explosions. there's eyewitnesses that have seen aliens. until these testify in a court of law then that's all they are, supposed witnesses. so do you believe the grey plane and explosion witnesses?

Speak to the family and friends for 911 truth who are offended by bozo's like you who persist with and propagate the official lies and cover up and help jeopardise their right to a fair and independent trial for the murder of their loved ones.

#clueless

Thank God the world as the uber clever theorists who are so smart they can't be fooled by the official lies and cover up. Or are they just narcissists who like to think they're more clever...with just a little dose of paranoia. :rofl

Show me the eyewitness testimony of people who were there that day that say they DIDN'T see a plane, that they just saw the building explode.

 

[Disco08]

Harry, this page is by no means an apologist site but the evidence here is pretty conclusive. Worth a look anyway.

http://rense.com/general32/phot.htm

 

[Disco08]

Yeah but you get bozos everywhere.

Really? They let bozos fly commercial airliners these days?

 

[Baloo]

Harry, this page is by no means an apologist site but the evidence here is pretty conclusive. Worth a look anyway.

http://rense.com/general32/phot.htm

Love the term "apologist". Who exactly is apologizing for what ? Or should we just have labels to make it easier to fabricate an us v them mentality ?

Apologists on one side. Not sure what to have on the other. So many worthy candidates, might be worthy of a poll.

 

[Baloo]

Really? They let bozos fly commercial airliners these days?

The Pilots for 911 Truth are all commercial airline pilots ?

 

[Azza]

These are some of the photos from Rosy's post a few pages ago, I assume you didn't click the link as you don't seem to have seen them. I haven't posted the photos of bodies, they're pretty gut wrenching.

Those pics really bring the disaster home for some reason (not just the bodies), more even than the WTC pics. They make you envisage the horror of a massive plane full of people being turned into a missile. Shocking.

 

[Disco08]

The Pilots for 911 Truth are all commercial airline pilots ?

Some of them are. Are they bozos Baloo?

 

[Baloo]

Some of them are. Are they bozos Baloo?

If they believe there was a US Government, multi agency, global media, local authority conspiracy that manufactured the 911 events then yes, definite bozos. Beyond doubt really.

 

[Disco08]

And if they're only offering their expert opinion on a matter which happens to contradict the OR?

Love the term "apologist". Who exactly is apologizing for what ? Or should we just have labels to make it easier to fabricate an us v them mentality ?

Apologists on one side. Not sure what to have on the other. So many worthy candidates, might be worthy of a poll.

Look it up. Christians embrace the term. Search it at look how loud and proud they are. All it signifies is that you believe and defend a certain story. Places like 911myths and debunking911 are classic apologist type sites. It's not a derogatory term.

 

[evo]

Harry, this page is by no means an apologist site but the evidence here is pretty conclusive. Worth a look anyway.

http://rense.com/general32/phot.htm

Well done, Duckman.

 

[Disco08]

Harry, a better explanation for the lack of plane debris is that it was all cleaned up and removed very quickly. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that. Suspicious though because it's completely inconsistent with any other crime scene or airline crash.

 

[Baloo]

Look it up. Christians embrace the term. Search it at look how loud and proud they are. All it signifies is that you believe and defend a certain story. Places like 911myths and debunking911 are classic apologist type sites. It's not a derogatory term.

Hehehehe, for someone so vehemently against being likened to an ID proponent, you're quick to use religous labels when it suits you.

As for whether its derogatory or not, surely that's up to the people you are labeling to decide, not you.

 

[Harry]

Harry, this page is by no means an apologist site but the evidence here is pretty conclusive. Worth a look anyway.

http://rense.com/general32/phot.htm

how did the hijacker manage, at full speed to neatly slip the plane inside the pentagon without debris flying all over the place ? The high view photo's of the scene on the day showing no plane wreckage is more convincing imo than these photo's taken a few days later. some experienced pilots have their concerns also.