You were the first person I thought when the trade happened.How many times did Mick Ablett say "surely not" with that F1 of Norfs.
Ah. Magnificent.
You were the first person I thought when the trade happened.
Nice of you to get something right I suppose.
Agree with a fair bit of that Leysey. I don't think we expected all the mids/runners to go between our 4th and 5th picks. Think they rate Hotton's movement to be back to pre-ACL levels (which it should) but he's not a great kick/decision maker (watch round 1 vs Calder - 3 shots on goal in 1st 2 mins for 0 goals and decision making in 2nd quarter is poor), but then neither was Shedda early days and he has a bit of him about him. I'm okay with that pick for upside but would have done it at pick 18.
I've been really high on Trainor and happy to take him there. Top 5 pick mid year and his concussion issues are overblown. Pedigree is elite, as are his foot skills. Previously a forward so can transition back there if needed for team balance. Solid option. Will be a player.
Once we got to the next pick you had to take Armstrong as the mids were gone. I'm not a Faull fan (doesn't hold enough contested marks for a 1st rounder and kicking is poor) and we could have got him with our later picks for sure but Armstrong and Faull are very different so they work togehter at least.
I'd love to see us trade back 5 or so picks again, pick up a bonus selection this/next year and then draft Dodson. Think he is a good long term prospect in an area of need,
1000%. That was the pick that was a head scratcher. When 2 top 14 picks aren't even in the room (which is surveyed with clubs by the AFL) you know you've reached a bit. If that pick is Allan/Berry/Oliver and we still get Armstrong and/or Shanahan/Whitlock/Dodson with our next pick the draft looks very different. Hindsight is wonderful.If we swap say Faull for - insert any of Berry, Allan, Hynes, Oliver the balance looks better. Reckon we miscalculated that.
Alright to be sarcastic/cynical about things but we got an exclusive cross to Geish at the club function post draft and when asked what the biggest surprise at who was available at our pick it was Armstrong who we rated in the 5-7 category also getting Norths future 1st was a bonus for future planning.shifter couldnt believe he was still there at 23
Bwaaaaah haaargh haaaargh haaargh.....Noorf !Will say it again. Norf are between a rock and a hard place.
Just like WCE during trade week, they have the choice of having to eat up a lot ....or eat up a lot less.
They can't just keep 2 and use it on Tauru and that's it. Done. They have to get another pick in this draft somehow and that's where they'll have to suck it up a bit in a trade with someone for the sake of avoiding a totally overs and inefficient outcome.
And they will. Just watch. They'll accept a trade with someone, of some sort or another, on draft night.
I told ya!Tonight we picked five blokes who at one point this year were considered top 5 picks.
We did not play it safe. Home run swings.
Sorry, but if Armstrong was rated in the 5-7 category there is no way we take Faull first (at 14). Posturing at it's finest.Alright to be sarcastic/cynical about things but we got an exclusive cross to Geish at the club function post draft and when asked what the biggest surprise at who was available at our pick it was Armstrong who we rated in the 5-7 category also getting Norths future 1st was a bonus for future planning.
Also said Lalor CLEARLY # 1 ranked and Smillie at 6 and an easy button to push, have followed his progress for years.
Or we could have got tea bagged ? Gulp.Faull was on somebody else's radar. We nabbed him. Armstrong? Got through to us.
Faull is macho. We're not the only club who noticed.
Fans may have copped Armstrong then Faull. But Faull is the only rugged tall forward in this draft. Crucially with Faull, despite an injury damaged season he got right - and then levelled up. He closed the season very strongly proving that he was better than his earlier injury damaged numbers showed.
Somebody else was on Faull. Twomey says Sydney. I think another as well.
How many of his goals are from true contested marks DIY?Faull was on somebody else's radar. We nabbed him. Armstrong? Got through to us.
Faull is macho. We're not the only club who noticed.
Fans may have copped Armstrong then Faull. But Faull is the only rugged tall forward in this draft. Crucially with Faull, despite an injury damaged season he got right - and then levelled up. He closed the season very strongly proving that he was better than his earlier injury damaged numbers showed.
Somebody else was on Faull. Twomey says Sydney. I think another as well.