But it will become lucky 7.
Pick 6 is cursed I tells ya - cursed!!!!
But it will become lucky 7.
Pick 6 is cursed I tells ya - cursed!!!!
Marty did his acl during this recording but KEPT PLAYINGJust one other thing on Hotton, he did his knee at training, just simply making a change of direction. A complete rupture. Not partial. That's not good.
As someone who has done 2 ACL's and had countless surgeries, MRI's, consults -all with the big name AFL surgeons and with my doctor as well who is a 12 year head doctor at a large AFL club (and sat in on some of my surgeries) - I can tell you that doing your knee that way is a worse way than getting a knock or someone falling across your leg. The reason being that suspicions start to rise that there is some sort of natural laxity in the joint v a blunt force causing the injury ie unlucky.
And I use the word "suspicions" because surgeons ultimately can not tell. MRI's and scopes will only look at the structure of things. You can't test or investigate for full load stress through your knee in the operating theatre or in the surgeons office. Only the individual themselves can do that, and even then, it's got to be over time and with repetition.
Every surgeon or specialist will tell you they did a perfect job and that structurally everything looks great. But not one of them will guarantee that you won't do it again or even that you are of minimal risk of doing it again. In fact, just 12 months ago my current surgeon (guy who is seen as the man by AFL clubs currently) said the knee is very complex and vague in many respects. Even MRI's only pick up structurally complete evaluations about 80% of the time. I've been victim of that - endless MRI's that show nothing, only to have a scope that pulls out multiple bone and cartilage fragments.
The good news for Hotton though, is that he did not damage his MCL or meniscus. That's good. Also good (perhaps) is that his revision surgery was for removal of excess scar tissue which indicates solid healing. Again, I've had that same excess scar tissue removed. It's a painful annoyance, but good in the sense of healed repair work.
But nobody...nobody... should expect any specialist can guarantee or even say that there's little chance of further issues. They can only talk to the structure of things.
I really cant see smith lasting to our pick #6 and we wil[ be facing a choice between Reid , Smillie , Tauru , Armstrong and AllanWho do you take at 7? I think pick 6 is much better placed to land Langford, Smith or Tauru. I agree with the rest however, we can still do damage with those later picks, that's the region for talls and there's a few this year.
If Carlton take Smillie then someone drops, unless Adelaide ignore Draper. I reckon by draft time there will be more clarity but 6 is still Tauru, that's a strong card to hold. I think we need to squeeze North here because holding our picks doesn't really hurt in the slightest.I really cant see smith lasting to our pick #6 and we wil[ be facing a choice between Reid , Smillie , Tauru , Armstrong and Allan
I see Noth as a bottom 5-6 team next year so their F1 is appealing to me for some picks in 2025
I would do 6 and 11 for 2 and F1 and that gives us the choice of 2 of FOS , Jagga , Lalaor as well as 2 top 5 picks next year
Who do you take at 7? I think pick 6 is much better placed to land Langford, Smith or Tauru. I agree with the rest however, we can still do damage with those later picks, that's the region for talls and there's a few this year.
If Carlton take Smillie then someone drops, unless Adelaide ignore Draper. I reckon by draft time there will be more clarity but 6 is still Tauru, that's a strong card to hold. I think we need to squeeze North here because holding our picks doesn't really hurt in the slightest.
Bravo BravoImagine how he'd react to Andy Maher conducting an interview.
So word on the street is Melbourne will take Lindsay at 5? That's helpful to our cause but I would prefer Langford or Smith over Draper. If it's a choice bewteen Draper or Tauru then I take the latter, I think Draper is in the second tier with Smillie & Allan.I reckon 1 of Smith or Langford will be there.
1 - Lalor
2 - FOS
3 - Langford / Draper
4 - Langford / Smith / Draper
5 - Lindsay
6 - Tauru
7 - Langford / Smith / Draper
Its why if we do the North deal, we probably need to do the Saints deal too. Then we lock in 3 key mids, to add to probably Dyson Sharp next year. Theres our 4 key mids for the next 10 years.
That sounds logical to me, Bully. MFC and StK both linked to Lindsay.So word on the street is Melbourne will take Lindsay at 5? That's helpful to our cause but I would prefer Langford or Smith over Draper. If it's a choice bewteen Draper or Tauru then I take the latter, I think Draper is in the second tier with Smillie & Allan.
It’s got a Caleb Windsor like rise. I believe the 5. And if I’m St Kilda I’m praying he is there with the two picks.There are 100? posters and 200? viewers of this thread. Who wouldn't take Lindsay at 10? Everybody would take him.
At 9? 8? Are we at #5 yet?
Lindsay wins contests. Lindsay runs towards goal, uses towards goal. Lindsay breaks lines. Smart in position. Smart with the ball. Can defend. Everybody wants Lindsay.
Is #5 too early? Or is Taylor potting the next raft of stocks?
We've all been waiting for Lindsay to emerge.