2024 Draft Thread | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

2024 Draft Thread

BTW if I'm not mistaken, I believe that some time ago you quietly boarded the train you so aptly named and are working your way to the front. (Let's hope the kid can walk.)

Admit it - you love the Donut.
I love cinnamon and iced donuts. Stable. Solid. Reliable high performers. I don't want a broken, puffy, mushy jam one that drips onto the floor or can't get through the oven heat with the other donuts.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users
I think it is pretty if we have 1 and 2. Smith will have to be one of them. So it’s out of Lalor and FOS for the other pick.
Given we had Jagga play 4 VFL games for us but then been linked to everyone bar him at 1, I think it’s almost safe to assume we don’t have him in our top 2 picks
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Norf negotiating through the media. We can be pretty confident that 2 and F1 for 6 & 11 is on the table. Maybe as the monk says with something later from our end but that's the guts of the deal. Norf want in on this draft. They currently have picks 2 & 62. They tried and failed to trade their F1 for 13.

I love our likely options at 10 & 11 in this draft: Hotton, Lindsay, Allan, an outside chance of Armstrong. It'd sting to give up one of those and possibly Smillie or Langford but to get FOS it's worth it. We could potentially trade up with say 18 & 23 for 13 and get our pick 11 man anyway.

Norf will rise next year but it's still probably a top-10, even top-5. (I think we'll try to trade it for Cadman anyway.)

If we get pick 2 you can bet your house we're taking Lalor and FOS. We're not that keen on Smith.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users
On who we give up at 6. I don't think it is Smillie or Langford: I think they go before. It's Jagga. And we don't care.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 3 users
I mentioned elsewhere that I would do the deal even if it involves us giving them back as I suspect our future 2nd or 3rd in the deal. Without it it is skewed too much in our favour you would think
Depends on how keen #Lolnorf are to split that pick 2. If they're desperate to get away from over reaching with their single premium pick this year to be able to get the bloke they want plus another dollop of early cream. Then they're the one's that have to come up with the sparkly shiny bonus of temptation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Norf negotiating through the media. We can be pretty confident that 2 and F1 for 6 & 11 is on the table. Maybe as the monk says with something later from our end but that's the guts of the deal. Norf want in on this draft. They currently have picks 2 & 62. They tried and failed to trade their F1 for 13.

I love our likely options at 10 & 11 in this draft: Hotton, Lindsay, Allan, an outside chance of Armstrong. It'd sting to give up one of those and possibly Smillie or Langford but to get FOS it's worth it. We could potentially trade up with say 18 & 23 for 13 and get our pick 11 man anyway.

Norf will rise next year but it's still probably a top-10, even top-5. (I think we'll try to trade it for Cadman anyway.)

If we get pick 2 you can bet your house we're taking Lalor and FOS. We're not that keen on Smith.
Why so confident on those picks? Smith has not done a thing wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Norf will rise next year but it's still probably a top-10, even top-5. (I think we'll try to trade it for Cadman anyway.)

North didn't win a game up to the bye this year, then only won 3 from 12 after the bye and those three games included West Coast and us. Total winning margin in those three games was 26 points.

They lost three games by under a goal during those last 12 games.

Even assuming they double their wins in a full 2025 year, and have a Collingwood luck run in the close games, then they will still not make the top 8 so the pick at best would be 10
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I mentioned elsewhere that I would do the deal even if it involves us giving them back as I suspect our future 2nd or 3rd in the deal. Without it it is skewed too much in our favour you would think
True true, but the reality of this trade is that North need itvto happen way more than we do.

I suspect we'd be quite happy taking our current hand into this draft.

North on the other hand would be paying overs using pick 2 on Tauru. If we don't do the deal, and Norf still take Tauru at 2, that means that the top end mids all fall one more spot in the draft, with us waiting with pick 6, and we stil hold all the lower first round picks.

If i was the Tige's i'd be holding our hand right up to selecting our first player on Nov 20, with Norf then given the mandatory 5 mins to decide on whether they want 2 top end players out of this draft or not. If they use their selection, well who cares. We still hold a damned good hand with all selections in hand.

Really imo Norf have backed themselves into a corner by trading out their 2nd rounder which could have secured them a decent tall prospect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Norf negotiating through the media. We can be pretty confident that 2 and F1 for 6 & 11 is on the table. Maybe as the monk says with something later from our end but that's the guts of the deal. Norf want in on this draft. They currently have picks 2 & 62. They tried and failed to trade their F1 for 13.

I love our likely options at 10 & 11 in this draft: Hotton, Lindsay, Allan, an outside chance of Armstrong. It'd sting to give up one of those and possibly Smillie or Langford but to get FOS it's worth it. We could potentially trade up with say 18 & 23 for 13 and get our pick 11 man anyway.
I was about to ask what further possible trading up we could do with those latter picks. Still a bit of pick trading to come to further strengthen our positioning of picks to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
True true, but the reality of this trade is that North need itvto happen way more than we do.

I suspect we'd be quite happy taking our current hand into this draft.

North on the other hand would be paying overs using pick 2 on Tauru. If we don't do the deal, and Norf still take Tauru at 2, that means that the top end mids all fall one more spot in the draft, with us waiting with pick 6, and we stil hold all the lower first round picks.

If i was the Tige's i'd be holding our hand right up to selecting our first player on Nov 20, with Norf then given the mandatory 5 mins to decide on whether they want 2 top end players out of this draft or not. If they use their selection, well who cares. We still hold a damned good hand with all selections in hand.

Really imo Norf have backed themselves into a corner by trading out their 2nd rounder which could have secured them a decent tall prospect
Our F3 is already gone to Freo as part of the Bolton trade.

#lolnorf could always look at trading their p2 and/or F1 + to Melbourne or st kilda. If they were interested of course. If they get knocked backfrom them..well there is only us to deal with
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Never seen a player with a better resume get talked down on these boards more. So weird.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 12 users
Think Dursma will be top 10 next year also and maybe a couple of promising talls, (not tied to academies), if they continue to develop and don't stagnate so 2 early picks may well net us another quality mid and tall fwd.
I wouldn't be pinning hopes on Cadman
ludowsky ( think thats his name} tall played fro sandy dragons under age this year
ryan onley tall mid 194 cm played under age this year
both very exciting prospects
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Source: Herald Sun

Much intrigue remains over whether Richmond and North Melbourne will do a deal which could land the Tigers the first two picks in this year’s national draft.

It is believed that the Kangaroos are open to trading pick two and a future first-round selection to Richmond, in exchange for picks six and 11 in this year’s draft.

Such a deal would still leave the Tigers with seven early selections this year — at picks 1, 2, 10, 19, 20, 23 and 24 — along with two first-round picks next year.
I like it but sounds too good to be true.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 user