2023 Women's World Cup | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

2023 Women's World Cup

Anyone else finding the streaming quality on 7plus terrible?

I know it's popular but i'm lucky to get 1 second out of 10 at the moment.
 
Ahhh.....don't you just love pedantry. Flogs now at the soccer. Back to 1-0.

NOW it's 2-0. Any more bloody reviews???
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
I am far from a world game aficionado but I thought I had a reasonable grasp on the off side rule. Clearly not.

How was that goal by Fowler ruled off side? There were at least 2 players between her and the goal when she kicked it. Then apparently it was Carpenter who was off side but she also had a player between her and the goal. And Fowler didn’t pass her the ball so how is it relevant anyway? I guess there is a valid explanation; can someone please fill me in?

Cheers.
 
Anyway incredible first half from the Matildas. Excellent response under pressure after a poor showing against Nigeria. Let’s hope they close it out.
 
I am far from a world game aficionado but I thought I had a reasonable grasp on the off side rule. Clearly not.

How was that goal by Fowler ruled off side? There were at least 2 players between her and the goal when she kicked it. Then apparently it was Carpenter who was off side but she also had a player between her and the goal. And Fowler didn’t pass her the ball so how is it relevant anyway? I guess there is a valid explanation; can someone please fill me in?

Cheers.
They said Carpenter was in the play and her foot was (marginally) behind the opposition player. Doubt that was the intention of the off side rule!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
They said Carpenter was in the play and her foot was (marginally) behind the opposition player. Doubt that was the intention of the off side rule!
Sounds like *smile*. The VAR image they showed didn’t even have the player behind Carpenter in the image! Only a player next to her. Bizarre.
 
They said Carpenter was in the play and her foot was (marginally) behind the opposition player. Doubt that was the intention of the off side rule!
As 'marginal' as Hops holding the ball.....I just laugh.
 
Sounds like *smile*. The VAR image they showed didn’t even have the player behind Carpenter in the image! Only a player next to her. Bizarre.
Brenton Speed said on twitter that offside call was garbage but should have been a foul against Carpenter anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user