evo said:Dyer'ere said:If the papers have any more guff, and the Age has put Rule on the case so they probably have heaps, they probably won't publish it yet.
There is a casualty. Cousins. Probably came earlier than they thought. And it would seem inhumane to go in too hard ATM. Might alienate their readership. Maybe they have some ethical qualms that apply tom his current state. Maybe they don't want their next story to get lost in this one.
But it won't be long before we start to read the new evidence if they have any.
Rule's just not in it for one preliminary story.
Agree dyere'ere.It'll come out eventually.Rule is a good and respected journalist.
What did people who saw Woosha last night think BTW?
He was fairly forthright and explained alot of the dilemas he faced but i find it dissapointing that he knew of this way back last July but did little because there was no 'hard evidence' but rather circumstantial and innuendo.
The mans a qualified chemist for god sake.He would've noticed the signs.He spent some time of nearly every day with the guy.
I find it a bit dissapointing he didn't act more decisevely back then when he could've nipped it in the bud.For Benny and the teams own good.Woosha and the west coast brains trust have obviously been involved in sweeping it under the carpet for too long.
Benny will end up being thankful to Rule i reckon with the benefit of hindsight,he bought this issue to a head and forced the clubs hand.If this had've gone on for the next number of months without club action it could've ended in alot more tears.
jb03 said:From Woosha's interview, in fairness to him he seemed to be implying that neither he, nor the club were actually equipped or able to handle the player/drugs situation.
Redford said:jb03 said:From Woosha's interview, in fairness to him he seemed to be implying that neither he, nor the club were actually equipped or able to handle the player/drugs situation.
Do you think that was a veiled accusation that the AFL's drug policy doesnt allow them currently to handle such situations very well JockBurn03 ?
Is that being reported as a change in AFL policy Andy - or is someone simply spilling the beans?Anduril said:ABC radio reports the "2 strike" players will be named over the weekend.
Anduril said:ABC radio reports the "2 strike" players will be named over the weekend.
Anduril said:ABC radio reports the "2 strike" players will be named over the weekend.
Anduril said:ABC radio reports the "2 strike" players will be named over the weekend.
Redford said:Anduril said:ABC radio reports the "2 strike" players will be named over the weekend.
Uh oh......stand by. If that happens, there's gonna be a lot of traffic on PRE over the weekend !
Hey Pesto! said:If anyone doubts his ability check out a replay of the Geel v WC game at Skilled last year. Geel were miles in front and Cousins kept running and running and the Coasters wore them down and won in the end.
Cousins' game that day was freakish. Absolutely top drawer!
yeah,well he's going to say that isn't he.It's everyone elses fault but his.When in doubt blame the AFL.jb03 said:Not sure that Woosha could have simply 'nipped it in the bud'. It is obviously not that simple. Cousins wouldn't stop simply because Woosha asked him to. IN fact Cousins has a history of telling people to eff off when questioned. Madcow is likely to be right, with the sniff of a flag they were more willing to believe his lies.
From Woosha's interview, in fairness to him he seemed to be implying that neither he, nor the club were actually equipped or able to handle the player/drugs situation.
Bennnny said:The West Coast people would have had to have known about his issues for years.
His inappropriate friends, phonr calls etc.
Very few people run from a booze bus, but a booze and drug bus (as I believe they have in Perth) may be different.
I'm sure everybody except the Weagles management would surmise why Cuz did the triathlon.
At that stage he should have been suspended by the club.
Exactly Toohey's.I'm glad you ,Benny(the PRE poster-good post by the way Benny)and a few others here have a grasp of the state of play.Tigers of Old said:To add to that I've had a friend who had a 'substance abuse problem' and you can tell in an instant when they've been using if you know the signs.
So to claim you were unaware is just a straight out load of bollocks.
.
evo said:jb03 said:Not sure that Woosha could have simply 'nipped it in the bud'. It is obviously not that simple. Cousins wouldn't stop simply because Woosha asked him to. IN fact Cousins has a history of telling people to eff off when questioned. Madcow is likely to be right, with the sniff of a flag they were more willing to believe his lies.
From Woosha's interview, in fairness to him he seemed to be implying that neither he, nor the club were actually equipped or able to handle the player/drugs situation.
Would you defend terry if he didn't do his utmost to try and get one of our players from heading down a dark path.Premiership aspirations or not.
;Djb03 said:evo said:jb03 said:Not sure that Woosha could have simply 'nipped it in the bud'. It is obviously not that simple. Cousins wouldn't stop simply because Woosha asked him to. IN fact Cousins has a history of telling people to eff off when questioned. Madcow is likely to be right, with the sniff of a flag they were more willing to believe his lies.
From Woosha's interview, in fairness to him he seemed to be implying that neither he, nor the club were actually equipped or able to handle the player/drugs situation.
Would you defend terry if he didn't do his utmost to try and get one of our players from heading down a dark path.Premiership aspirations or not.
Yes.