Baloo said:We'll agree to disagree. In a game where a loss means your whole campaign is over, you don't go for an overly attacking side. In a game where it's win or nothing, you change your approach.
jb03 said:That makes no sense. By not "losing" the second game, the result of the third ultimately became irrelevant. We had to win the second game, even moreso because they were our direct competition for the second spot.
Baloo said:When it was time for the subs we were in the game and we’re holding the Danes off. You don’t go putting on a 38yo hoping a cross lands on his head at the risk of getting exposed and copping a goal. Bert wasn’t playing for a draw, Nor were his decisions made to settle for a draw, but there was no way he was going to make a sub that would weaken the teams defensive setup. Conceding a goal meant conceding the World Cup.
It’s really not that hard to understand.
MD Jazz said:Yet most soccer media pundits disagree. By not winning we left our fate in others hands. That last 20 was the perfect time for our best ever goal maker.
Baloo said:Can't be bothered
mrposhman said:I don't understand the Japanese. They hadn't qualified, but rested some of their best players. It was in their interest to win to be on the better side of the draw. Who would you rather face potentially in the last 16 and quarter finals, England and then one of Sweden or Switzerland, or Belgium and then one of Brazil or Mexico.
Strange decision to not go for the win and win the group and get on the easier side of the draw.
Prior to the fair play rule. How did it used to be split when you had two teams on equal pts and equal on 'For' and 'Against' Goals?Baloo said:Group H second qualifier decided on Fair Play points. Japan knocking Senegal out. 4 yellow cards to 6 I think. Senegalese must be gutted.
Panthera Tigris said:Prior to the fair play rule. How did it used to be split when you had two teams on equal pts and equal on 'For' and 'Against' Goals?
Nomorewaiting said:That's the key to all this Panthera.
I think I recall at one stage we had close to 10? Someone can confirm this for me who is more knowledgeable than me. I think it was in the World Cup year we play Italy and were robbed???
Another key is junior level. Encourage attacking flair after teaching the basic skills of soccer . Had to start younger and more money needs to be poured in by the Aust Soccer Body and Govts.
Do we still have an Aust under 21?
Well I figure Posh. Why not use what outstanding environment we have at our disposal. Australia has so many marvelous beaches. Just another way of expanding our love affair with the beach. Like I say, would love to see the Surf Life Saving Clubs adding beach soccer to the sports under their umbrella, in partnership with FFA and local soccer clubs. No doubt it is already played, but it's not really that formal or mainstream.mrposhman said:You are onto something there PT.
For a long time coaching in the UK was very traditional. Focused around the basics, defend well, get balls forward, direct, down the wings and get crosses in. Around 10-15 years ago after many abject failures the philosophy was changed and different skillsets were revisited. We are starting to see that now with players playing in the national team with more flair and more individual skill than we have seen rather than the odd one with excellent technical skill sets. The game changed, and England took a long while to change with it.
Australia is partly similar to that but play more of those variants. I think looking at Futsal / beach soccer is an interesting look at things as they do teach different skills than when you play on the larger pitches. The balls are different and certainly focus on different skill sets that can be taken into the longer form of the game. England was very slow on the uptake of futsal, national team was only incorporated in 2003.
Tactics in soccer will only get you so far, the skill level is what sets you apart and its clear from looking at the finalists over the last 20 years that skill levels are what really drive improvements in onfield success.
From an Australia perspective I really do see a lot of similarities with England in terms of old school skill sets, there aren't many players that you look at for Australia that could unlock defences. Even looking back at the previous stars of Australian soccer and the same pattern runs. Kewell was largely defined by pace than ridiculous amounts of skill, hence why when injuries caught up with him, his performances fell off a cliff. Viduka was great but very much an old school type of striker. Emerton similar to Kewell but more structure not as much pace etc etc
MD Jazz said:Yet most soccer media pundits disagree. By not winning we left our fate in others hands. That last 20 was the perfect time for our best ever goal maker.
Panthera Tigris said:Well I figure Posh. Why not use what outstanding environment we have at our disposal. Australia has so many marvelous beaches. Just another way of expanding our love affair with the beach. Like I say, would love to see the Surf Life Saving Clubs adding beach soccer to the sports under their umbrella, in partnership with FFA and local soccer clubs. No doubt it is already played, but it's not really that formal or mainstream.
jb03 said:Agree Jazzy. Not sure soccer is Balooga's strong suit.
Baloo said:What are you talking about? Every 4 years my expertise rivals Spud Frawley.
MD Jazz said:Yet most soccer media pundits disagree. By not winning we left our fate in others hands. That last 20 was the perfect time for our best ever goal maker.
MD Jazz said:Yet most soccer media pundits disagree. By not winning we left our fate in others hands. That last 20 was the perfect time for our best ever goal maker.
Brodders17 said:most soccer media pundits, even the 'experts' are cheerleaders. the commentators are shocking. yes they are calling to an aussie audience, but they spend more time cheering and talking the team up than calling the action and analysing the game.
he is our best goal scorer ever, but he is finished. when he came on against Peru he got them worried for a few minutes, but then did nothing. he could have scored except a short cross was terrible but besides that he was a non-event.
we had a guy on the bench who has actually been playing and scoring. he didnt get a run, but noone seems to care about him.