To apply logic to this ailing thread:
1) defending the ground is important to our coaching staff, and therefore the team
2) we have a couple of once in a generation ball users in Martin and Bolton
3) to maximise the frankly devastating weaponry these two possess, we give them free reign, often forward of the contest
4) if we are to do this, there must be a balance in the ledger. Dimma is nothing if not a sharp accounting mind
5) there is a clique of players within the squad who play selfless roles to balance out our offense. These players often do not trouble the statistician a great deal, but seek to hit internal KPIs. All clubs implement some form of this.
6) there are defensive contest players. Jack Graham would be looking to meet the oppo ball winning bull and tackle at every opportunity.
7) there are outlet wingers, gut runners like Pickett and KMac who are tasked with providing options on the fat side and supporting outlets from D50.
8) there are containment players who take the previous role a step further, starting in F50 and sprinting to deny easy oppo outlets from their own D50. Jake Aarts and yes, Jason Castagna perform containment roles.
9) the aforementioned containment roles are critical in slowing the aggressive ball movement the best sides are now deploying to take advantage of the stand rule. Our best teams over the past six years have always penalised fast movement like a fly hitting the spiders web. Our back seven is drilled to intercept, but ideally we wanna turn it over as close to our own F50 as possible. Wide containment funnels the pill where we want it to go - where Nankervis, Prestia, Edwards and finally Bolton / Martin are waiting in sequence.
10) the nature of George and Jake’s containment roles perversely result in fewer possessions than others because if they contain effectively they will inevitably be …
where the ball is not
for much of the game.
Now is that enough logic for y’all or do we need Coburg to preach to us again on George’s chronic inability to run?