Welcome to Tigerland - Tim Taranto | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Welcome to Tigerland - Tim Taranto

Workhorse in the middle. Elite endurance. Worth every bit of the trade we did.
Double the amount of tackles than next best on the ground, easily the most pressure acts, equal most clearances and disposals, and second most contested possessions. Doing it both defensively and offensively. Also ran the most KMs on the ground - that’s now 6 out of 9 games this season. Unreal
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0781.jpeg
    IMG_0781.jpeg
    244.2 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0782.jpeg
    IMG_0782.jpeg
    244.8 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_0783.jpeg
    IMG_0783.jpeg
    249.9 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_0784.jpeg
    IMG_0784.jpeg
    246.7 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_0785.jpeg
    IMG_0785.jpeg
    247.5 KB · Views: 9
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
Remember Mitchell wasn't free to Collingwood. They basically swapped him for Ollie Henry (a former Pick 17 that had shown plenty).

The trade for the Pies was essentially.

In - Mitchell and Pick 25
Out - Henry and Picks 41 and 50 (which in points calcs is close to the same as 25)

A better pick than the 2 they gave up so a bit of a positive there but it doesn't take away that they basically swapped him for 1 of their best prospects.

As we'd traded Picks 14 and 23 for TT (and wouldn't have done anything different there, the difference here is really Hopper or Mitchell - assuming Mitchell wanted to come to us). How do we match or beat that trade???

Pick 31 by itself wouldn't have cut it. I imagine we'd have had to still give up our 1st anyway, but likely got something back rather than giving up 31 as well for Hopper, so largely the argument around a future 1st is moot if we include Mitchell, as its likely gone either way.
PRE still running with the line Mitchell cost Ollie Henry, Hawthorn did not receive Henry, they received pick 41 & 50. Collingwood were compensated for Henry, it was effectively a straight swap for Jakob Ryan.
 
Great chat with Daniel Harford on RSN this morning where Timmy speaks well about Dimma and also includes what he thinks about Cornhole (from 12:00 minutes on). This shows how down to earth he is.

Was just about to post the link.

Tim was asked about Cornhole, and said that while he hadn't experienced anything like that before, it doesn't faze him.

Said he's sure Cornhole's boss is happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Was just about to post the link.

Tim was asked about Cornhole, and said that while he hadn't experienced anything like that before, it doesn't faze him.

Said he's sure Cornhole's boss is happy.
Yeah, I loved the way he spoke even admitting he's not the best kick. No ego this bloke. What I like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
PRE still running with the line Mitchell cost Ollie Henry, Hawthorn did not receive Henry, they received pick 41 & 50. Collingwood were compensated for Henry, it was effectively a straight swap for Jakob Ryan.

Wrong.

Geelong received Henry. Gave up Stephens and Pick 25
Hawthorn received Stephens and Picks 41 and 50. Gave up Mitchell
Collingwood received Mitchell and 25, and gave up Henry, 41 and 50.

41 and 50 are very close in value to 25, though I'm happy to give a bit more weighting to 25 because its a higher pick, but doesn't get away from the fact that they basically gave up Henry for a small upgrade and Mitchell.

1684300147907.png

BTW - it doesn't matter what Hawthorn gave up or received, there is always some imbalance in any trade, but its very clear what Collingwood received and gave up.

In Mitchell and 25
Out Henry, 41 and 50

Whats more, what would we have been able to give up for him. We'd traded what became 14 and 23 for Taranto - as we should, so the only argument is the Hopper trade. So we had Pick 31 and then what else??? We'd have needed more than 31 to have got him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Wrong.

Geelong received Henry. Gave up Stephens and Pick 25
Hawthorn received Stephens and Picks 41 and 50. Gave up Mitchell
Collingwood received Mitchell and 25, and gave up Henry, 41 and 50.

41 and 50 are very close in value to 25, though I'm happy to give a bit more weighting to 25 because its a higher pick, but doesn't get away from the fact that they basically gave up Henry for a small upgrade and Mitchell.

View attachment 19260

BTW - it doesn't matter what Hawthorn gave up or received, there is always some imbalance in any trade, but its very clear what Collingwood received and gave up.

In Mitchell and 25
Out Henry, 41 and 50

Whats more, what would we have been able to give up for him. We'd traded what became 14 and 23 for Taranto - as we should, so the only argument is the Hopper trade. So we had Pick 31 and then what else??? We'd have needed more than 31 to have got him.
Pure supposition, no assurance Mitchell wanted to or would have come to Richmond anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yeah, I loved the way he spoke even admitting he's not the best kick. No ego this bloke. What I like.
I wonder if, now that Taranto has said “yep you’re right, I’m not a great kick”, that Cornes will finally STFU about it!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Pure supposition, no assurance Mitchell wanted to or would have come to Richmond anyway.
Yes, can everybody PLEASE finally stop talking about Tom bloody Mitchell? This is a TARANTO thread, talk about TARANTO. Every time I come on here Mitchell keeps getting brought up.. or who we could’ve got in the draft (which frankly noone has a clue unless you’re Matt Clarke or one of the recruiting team). If people want to talk about the “what could have beens” of the trade period, create a thread and go there. Taranto is a Richmond player, and a bloody good one at that, so let’s keep this about him, and take the trade talk elsewhere.
Sorry if that comes across as rude but that’s been building for a while. Rant over
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13 users
It was only a matter of time until Taranto spoke out. This is bullying, a personal crusade about one player.

With mental health and all, I am somewhat surprised his media employers haven’t pulled him up on the constant barrage of articles.

taranto.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
It was only a matter of time until Taranto spoke out. This is bullying, a personal crusade about one player.

With mental health and all, I am somewhat surprised his media employers haven’t pulled him up on the constant barrage of articles.

taranto.jpg
And this is from an All Australian selector too. Tim could easily be in the conversation for the squad of 44 at this stage of the season, but not with one member of the selection panel who clearly has something against him!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Wrong.

Geelong received Henry. Gave up Stephens and Pick 25
Hawthorn received Stephens and Picks 41 and 50. Gave up Mitchell
Collingwood received Mitchell and 25, and gave up Henry, 41 and 50.

41 and 50 are very close in value to 25, though I'm happy to give a bit more weighting to 25 because its a higher pick, but doesn't get away from the fact that they basically gave up Henry for a small upgrade and Mitchell.

View attachment 19260

BTW - it doesn't matter what Hawthorn gave up or received, there is always some imbalance in any trade, but its very clear what Collingwood received and gave up.

In Mitchell and 25
Out Henry, 41 and 50

Whats more, what would we have been able to give up for him. We'd traded what became 14 and 23 for Taranto - as we should, so the only argument is the Hopper trade. So we had Pick 31 and then what else??? We'd have needed more than 31 to have got him.
Cooper Stephens was worth diddly squat, Mitchell a salary cap dump, if you paid him his entire wage he would have been free in all likelihood. Typical of PRE to change the narrative of Mitchell is a dud that nobody wants to suddenly being worth a first rounder.

We've been over this territory so many times any further discussion is senseless, Collingwood nailed the trade, Ryan looks a great acquisition, like for like when sizing up Henry plus they got their clearance machine. Fantastic trading and totally at odds with the PRE line they sold the farm. Mitchell could have been stitched up with a future second if Hawthorn pay part salary, probably a future third if Richmond pay 100%. Taranto as I've said adnauseum will be serviceable but may not ever see finals, it's all in the timing, very similar to bringing in Kane Johnson and missing 250 games of Daniel Wells.

But time to let this go, I'm pretty much done on the topic & pretty much done with the constant shifting of the goal posts, if you have any doubt about Mitchell's standing amongst Richmond supporters & the Richmond hierarchy then have a look at some of the comments made prior to the season. The fact none of you have even acknowledged that Mitchell is playing better than the preseason predictions tells me this will always be an exercise in spin & subterfuge.

As for Hopper, if the cost is too great then let it go, I would have been fine with trading out of 2022 but keeping our 2023 picks intact, that was a reasonable compromise, but throwing up a potential top 10 pick and a potential key forward/ well rounded midfielder too high a price on a player coming back from a PCL and a player who would have been a free agent in 2023. The way things are shaping up I'd say I've been entirely accurate but let's just see how the season unfolds from here. I'd personally like to see us scrape in a finals appearance but history says that's highly unlikely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Cooper Stephens was worth diddly squat, Mitchell a salary cap dump, if you paid him his entire wage he would have been free in all likelihood. Typical of PRE to change the narrative of Mitchell is a dud that nobody wants to suddenly being worth a first rounder.

We've been over this territory so many times any further discussion is senseless, Collingwood nailed the trade, Ryan looks a great acquisition, like for like when sizing up Henry plus they got their clearance machine. Fantastic trading and totally at odds with the PRE line they sold the farm. Mitchell could have been stitched up with a future second if Hawthorn pay part salary, probably a future third if Richmond pay 100%. Taranto as I've said adnauseum will be serviceable but may not ever see finals, it's all in the timing, very similar to bringing in Kane Johnson and missing 250 games of Daniel Wells.

But time to let this go, I'm pretty much done on the topic & pretty much done with the constant shifting of the goal posts, if you have any doubt about Mitchell's standing amongst Richmond supporters & the Richmond hierarchy then have a look at some of the comments made prior to the season. The fact none of you have even acknowledged that Mitchell is playing better than the preseason predictions tells me this will always be an exercise in spin & subterfuge.

As for Hopper, if the cost is too great then let it go, I would have been fine with trading out of 2022 but keeping our 2023 picks intact, that was a reasonable compromise, but throwing up a potential top 10 pick and a potential key forward/ well rounded midfielder too high a price on a player coming back from a PCL and a player who would have been a free agent in 2023. The way things are shaping up I'd say I've been entirely accurate but let's just see how the season unfolds from here. I'd personally like to see us scrape in a finals appearance but history says that's highly unlikely.

How am I "moving the goalposts" and "changing the narrative" when all I did was show what the ACTUAL trade was.

I really like your input throughout the BB but you need to be able to accept some level of alternative views. There is no scheme here to get you, all I did was show the trade.

Cooper Stephens is not a part of the Collingwood trade.

They traded Henry, 41 and 50 for Mitchell and 25. Thats cold hard fact. 25 and 41/50 are almost offset by each other (like I said with extra weighting towards Pick 25), so Mitchell (and a lower salary) was essentially traded for Henry and an upgraded pick. Not sure what there is to argue against here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users