It's interesting how much emphasis they put on physical traits such as height and size in this pre-draft look:
DRAFT ANALYSIS: “An explosive tall midfielder who excels at winning stoppages”
central.rookieme.com
Note that his main strength is to win the contested possession and handball out of a stoppage, and that he "always" gets his arms up in order to release those elite handballs.
But that's a double conditional.
If A, then B
If B, then C
He's only ever shown elite traits in C, while being described as below average in every other area of the game.
His pace assumes he has the smarts to run into appropriate spaces, but without those smarts, his pace would be a non-factor in the midfield, so again, his elite trait is a double conditional. You won't see it at AFL level unless all conditions are met.
The link also says he struggles to get the ball in transition because of physical factors (endurance). But people tend to over-attribute things to physical traits when it happens in front of their eyes. It could also be his mind, his vision, his footy IQ, his attitude, his psychology, his spatial awareness - his
brain, not body.
Then you would have a player who's a one trick pony of a one trick pony with flaws that are assumed to be fixable only because they've been misattributed to body over mind.
Hopefully not, but either way, the basic idea is something that rings true in most area of life - people think too much about the body and not enough about the mind.