They never are.The Count called it in July when he said Essendon wasn't ready for finals.
They never are.The Count called it in July when he said Essendon wasn't ready for finals.
Hun didn't take longJust watched the second half.
Footscray's defence looked good in the wet, but maybe that's the problem. They do lack height down back so in a dour game in rain they were good. The other aspect was that Footscray always looked like they had more numbers at the ball, always had an outlet, players shepherd and support each other. Took a fair few half chances in front of goal too. I really can't see them getting to the GF but would be a slight chance to beat Brissie.
Those free kicks to Weightman certainly got some comment here. Far be it for me to defend an umpire, but that first free was so blatantly clear it was not funny. The Essendon player was holding Weightman and dragging him back so he could not contest the mark - too much of this and it needs to be penalised - clear, very clear, holding the man. The second one was a mystery.
Neither team seemed to have any clue about how to handle a wet ball. Not much practice these days I suppose. Footscray played better wet weather football but so many spilled marks.
DS
No doubt we get a harder draw.In our draw pool.... Let's compare the pair when the time comes...
Hun didn't take long
Hope he delists Caracalla and sends him back to us.Rutten spent the last quarter working on and writing down his delistings
Why would Port deserve a home grand final against Melbourne?
Wouldn't be surprised to see the Dees do a Marlion Pickett with Nathan Jones in the GF. Poor bloke deserves to play in it after 16 years in a sh!t team.
What about Robo’s final 10 idea?Do we need to go back to a final 6?
RoCo taking it wellIn a week’s time we’ll hear of a few Essendon nuffs having to front the Magistrates Court for online abuse. Nothing surer.
That's Con the Fruiterer......."ahhh duzen matter"In the words of Uncle Arthur “Couple of days.... beautiful “
Essendrugs don’t go changing