No idea Mr P.Wasn't that the justification for the 4th umpire. They are calling 2 of them as being umpires that mainly patrol the 50m arcs, in order to stamp out this sort of tactic.
I wasn’t justifying it
No idea Mr P.Wasn't that the justification for the 4th umpire. They are calling 2 of them as being umpires that mainly patrol the 50m arcs, in order to stamp out this sort of tactic.
That is the problem…. It is almost never paid. When umpires are instructed to only pay the obvious free kicks cos they don’t want EVERY free kick paid (slows down the game) the game is flawed and the result IS controlled by the umpires. Only when ALL free kicks are paid will it be a level playing field. The AFL should trial paying all free kicks -I wonder if the blocking and holding and arm chopping would naturally disappear or at least be reduced. At the moment the players know what they can and cannot get away with but if they knew EVERY free kick would be paid would it change the way the game is played or would it become a technicality nightmare. Would it make it any lease frustrating to watch than it already is?
Absolutely he is. It's infuriating what he gets away with. Throws the ball like a rugby player.Is cripps a protected species, he seems allowed to do whatever he wants - throws, dropping the ball, high tackles etc
Absolutely perfect. Yes there really was four main stooges not just three. Larry, Mo, Curly and Shemp. With another couple of later entries by Joe Besser n Joe De Rita. Could it be an omen that eventually we'll have six maggots crawling all over the game in future.
Is cripps a protected species, he seems allowed to do whatever he wants - throws, dropping the ball, high tackles etc
the commentators were in love with Carlton last nightCommentator says 'lynch held out of it brilliantly by weitering'
Oh wiseguy. Why I oughta……Absolutely perfect. Yes there really was four main stooges not just three. Larry, Mo, Curly and Shemp. With another couple of later entries by Joe Besser n Joe De Rita. Could it be an omen that eventually we'll have six maggots crawling all over the game in future.
Yeah. Imagine if they missed one like that with a minute to go in the Grand Finale and it led to the winning goal.That’s a free kick, no doubt at all.
However It is almost never paid
Doesn’t matter what the actual rule is. Whatever it is, it doesn’t apply to us if it advantages usWhat is the actual rule on blocking in a marking contest?
watched the replay, this is so true, so obvious. Fair dinkum, its dumb umpiring. 1 the frees are barely there, if at all, 2. haveing staging form supposedly, allegedly, logically, means the umps are likely to not pay them to players with form.Adam 'Collapses' Cerra. Crumples Jr.
Cochin isn’t according to the keyboard warriors on Twitter. “ Protected species since he headhunted Shiel in 2017 and is an overrated sniper”Yes. I think Dusty and cotchy are the only non-protected species brownlow winners of any era?
It's a free kick to the blocked player. Unless that player is a Richmond forward.What is the actual rule on blocking in a marking contest?
Except when it is.That’s a free kick, no doubt at all.
However It is almost never paid
Glenn Close?This Bradley Close looks like something out of a foreign SBS movie.
Last minute, nank send a ball in, weitering devotes himself to sheparding lynch from the contest,
Easy carlton mark.
Commentator says 'lynch held out of it brilliantly by weitering'
Not even big richo could argue weitering was doing anything other than blocking Tom.
What is the actual rule on blocking in a marking contest?
Clause 18.5.2