It’s a mystery isn’t it? We all know the people at afl headquarters making all the rule changes are all simple minded simpletons, so making the simple decisions should come naturally. But no, they always go for the most complex convoluted “ solutions “For the record the frees were 23 to 17. Tigers 17.
And we had four 50 metre penalties to boot.
The simple answer to the stand rule is to get rid of it altogether, but that won't happen under the current administration.
It was only introduced by Shocking to enable the Pussies to win a flag.
TBR has explain why thats the case before - Umps have a clear bias towards Jack and Tommy and its the palyers own fault so just accept it.It's also a matter of where we get free kicks when we actually get them. Lynch gets smashed from pillar to post & can barely buy a free near goal.
No, the umpire was right. Clearly you, and many on here, do not understand the rules. TBR will come along to explain why it was a free shortly.
TBR has explain why thats the case before - Umps have a clear bias towards Jack and Tommy and its the palyers own fault so just accept it.
Also Harmes contributed to the ‘wrestle’. Don’t think Cumbo didOn rewatching the game early in Q1 Cumberland takes a mark and Petty comes in late and drops his elbow in Cumbo's back while he is lying on the ground. Not much force but totally unnecessary like Cotch's. These should be considered the same. Nothing in either but the media beat up is *smile*.
I have it on video but appears I am unable to load it here.
Need a DRS.No, the umpire was right. Clearly you, and many on here, do not understand the rules. TBR will come along to explain why it was a free shortly.
Yes you could possibly be right considering Reddog was the only other person who seemed to understand it...however you are on record stating that Lynch and Jack's previous on field behavours have influenced how they are now umpired.Not only is that complete dribble, I don't even think it makes sense.
Ha...even after the media tried their best to hang him. Did deserve something for sure though.Fine for cotch!! hes available
Grab the popcorn watch the haters come out of the woodworkHa...even after the media tried their best to hang him. Did deserve something for sure though.
however you are on record stating that Lynch and Jack's previous on field behavours have influenced how they are now umpired.
2013 give me a break!To a very small degree, they might miss one occasionally and Riewoldt much more than Lynch.
But if you do stuff like this you can't really complain if the umpire is reluctant to give you the benefit of the doubt when it comes to a push in the back.
2013 give me a break!
Jack goes alright compared to some other tall forwards below.To a very small degree, they might miss one occasionally and Riewoldt much more than Lynch.
But if you do stuff like this you can't really complain if the umpire is reluctant to give you the benefit of the doubt when it comes to a push in the back.
Jack goes alright compared to some other tall forwards below.
At least he's around the zero mark for 'frees for/frees against' with -9 the difference.
Buddy Walker, Hawkins, Cameron, Daniher, Lynch will all end up, most with massive negative free kick splits.
Jack could get 9 more than against this year and get to a career 'frees for/ frees against' at a 0 plus/minus
Agree with your second sentence. Balta, in particular gave away a shocking 50 before half time in a hissy fit which should have had him dragged for a very big please explain.Two issues I repeat each year; Umpires need to become full time professional with significant remuneration not the current zealot amateurs. Richmond needs to actively train against giving undisciplined, crude and stupid frees (world leaders in 50m penalties).