For mine we take the 2 picks to the Draft, in a shallow draft we currently could get 3 picks inside 30 incl Naish.
Tony Braxton-Hicks said:A simple exercise would be to look at how many top 4 picks in the past 10 years were worth it. What if you got a Gumbleton? Or a Morabito? Could you have instead nabbed Alex Rance and Callan Ward (2007 example)? Or maybe we could have nabbed Nick Vlastuin AND Brodie Grundy (2012)?
It takes a team to win, and usually I'd rather add two quality players to the mix than one.
bullus_hit said:Here's some analysis of pick 1 versus pick 4 & 7 leading up to the McCartin draft.
1999 - Fraser (1),
Pavlich (4) & Danny Roach (7)
2000 - Riewoldt (1)
Luke Livingston (4) & Lawrence Anguin (7)
2001 - Hodge (1)
Polak (4) & Hale (7)
2002 - Goddard (1)
Tim Walsh (4) & Andrew Mackie (7)
2003 - Cooney (1)
Farren Ray (4) & Kane Tenace (7)
2004 - Deledio (1)
Tambling (4) & Jordan Lewis (7)
2005 - Murphy (1)
Josh Kennedy (4) & Patrick Ryder (7)
2006 - Gibbs (1)
Leuenberger (4) & Joel Selwood (7)
2007 - Kreuzer (1)
Cale Morton (4) & Rhys Palmer (7)
2008 - Watts (1)
Hamish Hartlett (4) & Daniel Rich (7)
2009 - Scully (1)
Anthony Morabito (4) & Brad Shepphard (7)
2010 - Swallow (1)
Andrew Gaff (4) & Josh Caddy (7)
2011 - Patton (1)
Will Hoskin-Elliott (4) & Nick Haynes (7)
2012 - Whitfield (1)
Jimmy Toumpas (4) & Ollie Wines (7)
2013 - Boyd (1)
Marcus Bontempelli (4) & James Aish (7)
Jonesracing82 said:For mine we take the 2 picks to the Draft, in a shallow draft we currently could get 3 picks inside 30 incl Naish.
yep, we could even trade into 2nd round i'd reckon that'd be handy too. end up with 4 picks inside 30-35ish for exampleTT33 said:I'm with you Jonesy, we should get as many early picks as possible
Jonesracing82 said:yep, we could even trade into 2nd round i'd reckon that'd be handy too. end up with 4 picks inside 30-35ish for example
TT33 said:I suppose we need to know what Dusty's doing before we can really establish our agenda.
Massive ramifications for us if he decides to go.
DirtyDogTiger said:Trade scuttlebutt on Twitter
Sources close to Richmond have told me? The dees have proposed a trade of 10 + 27 for 15 +17 to assist in lever deal #AFLTrades #exclusive
The Hawthorn and St.Kilda trade of last year shows what sides will do when desperate for picks.DirtyDogTiger said:Trade scuttlebutt on Twitter
Sources close to Richmond have told me? The dees have proposed a trade of 10 + 27 for 15 +17 to assist in lever deal #AFLTrades #exclusive
bullus_hit said:10 & 2018 second rounder better.
wayne said:10 and 2018 first is even betterer.
DirtyDogTiger said:Trade scuttlebutt on Twitter
Sources close to Richmond have told me? The dees have proposed a trade of 10 + 27 for 15 +17 to assist in lever deal #AFLTrades #exclusive
DirtyDogTiger said:Trade scuttlebutt on Twitter
Sources close to Richmond have told me? The dees have proposed a trade of 10 + 27 for 15 +17 to assist in lever deal #AFLTrades #exclusive
Somebody's quoting zippers as a source close to Richmond, or is he tweeting his own rumours.DirtyDogTiger said:Trade scuttlebutt on Twitter
Sources close to Richmond have told me? The dees have proposed a trade of 10 + 27 for 15 +17 to assist in lever deal #AFLTrades #exclusive
bullus_hit said:10 & 2018 second rounder better.
mrposhman said:Reckon either of these we should go back to Melbourne with
In Picks 10, 27 and their 2018 2nd (lets say Pick 31) = 2704 points
Out Picks 15, 17 and 50 = 2410 points
Adds a 2nd next year and gets points for Naish. Pick 27 and 53 has all bases pretty much covered
Or
In Picks 10, 45 and their 2018 2nd (lets say Pick 31) = 2348 points
Out Picks 15 and 17 = 2137 points
Still gives us the 2nd next year and also gives us an extra 3rd for Naish. Picks 45, 50 and 53 will also have us covered, we'll just have to go into the draft with an extra spot on the list than the 1st option which is why I prefer that one.