-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Trade Week - NON-Richmond only
- Thread starter Leysy Days
- Start date
It happened with Buddy didn't it? I remember the farce discussion, pick 20 for buddy, what was Frawley? 6 or something? That is an uber farce right there
If Frawley is worth 6, Buddy is worth 3 top 10 picks, and alternatively, if Buddy is worth 20, Frawley is worth 72.
I understand why they do it that way, but dunno if its the only way or the fairest way. As some of the farcical results objectively show. When you get divorced, there are some schools of thought that the only way to get the right value of the house is to auction it. I've seen houses go for way unders and way overs at auction. But there are other ways, you can get 3 valuations.
That is all things being equal. As we all know, its not. the AFL has amazing abilities to balls things up. If we changed the system we'd still get Jason Wild getting valued higher than Dusty.
Yep. That's the one, ts. Buddy was the nightmare loss of the type.
So rare are legends this year that there is nobody around to compare the loss to.
If there's a 26yo Buddy at Sydney this year and he decides to go to Hawthorn for what would be $20M Sydney would get pick #20 or whatever. There'd be one club bleating then and only one.
Let's not forget that so devastated were the Hawks by the Buddy loss that they put away the next two premierships. Compensation is awarded based primarily on finishing ladder position. Like the draft system. That seems right to me. Keeps it interesting.
The Perryman trade for the Pies feels very us from two years ago with Taranto & Hopper. Chasing one last shot for the old brigade.
Farm? Did you say farm? He’s not off to Geelong.
If it’s Collingwood it’s probably more likely to be a massage parlour
Father sons just go to their father’s club or they go. In the draft end of no bs impacting d raft orders.
And if they’re still keen on playing at dads old club, they can go when they’re out of contract.
F@#&$,@# wankers they areScum now wants Houston....BUT.....they have no 1st round pick to trade.....
Last edited:
Theyre asking GC pick 13 for NobleScum now wants Houston....BUT.....they have no 1st round pick to trade.....
Agree to some extent.
Keep father/son I reckon that is reasonable.
Compo for a free agent is a bit dodgy, maybe get rid of it, but at the very least reduce the compensation. Say, Band 1 is 2nd round and go from there.
Academies are a total rort. Either get rid of them, or teams get preference on players who are signed to the club in the VFL, WAFL and SANFL (TFL too in a few years?).
DS
And the pies future first.Theyre asking GC pick 13 for Noble
We pegged this - suns want future firsts
Contract is one option.
Could also look at draft position - ie pick 17 plays average 200 games, with 15 brownlow votes and three top 5 finishes in the club bnf.
Could also look at salary compared to the rest of the list - eg Perryman is #8 top paid player at pies (daicos, moore, degoey, pendlebury, crisp, howe, daicos ) so that equates to r3 pick.
The rating would be based off historic draft data - where the top paid players were historically selected.
