-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Trade period 2021
- Thread starter zippadeee
- Start date
so looks official based on AFL article.
www.afl.com.au
Coleman-Jones, Tarrant swap clubs after Roos, Tigers strike deal
North Melbourne and Richmond have sealed a trade for CCJ and Tarrant
www.afl.com.au
The thing that is always forgotten is that the number 1 pick in the PSD is available for the best delisted player or best non drafted player around. Sending CCJ to the PSD means that North would forfeit that opportunity.
Decent players can be around for that pick
If we use them to get another pick in the 20-30 range (or next year in the same range), I'll be happy.
Looks like there will be some good players in the 20-30 range, or if it falls into next year, we go into the draft with 1st and 3 2nds which puts us in a great position again at next years draft.
And hopefully 18 as our own 1st rounder...18 and 19 next year is a good start.
Next year is no good. We‘ll have the same excess pick situation again. As I’ve been saying, that just kicks the can down the road. Needs to be 23 or 27 - unless it brings something crazy good in 2022.
Its not really kicking the can down the road.
I'll have to take a look at the list again (as I lost the file I had before), but I think we had 5 spots on the main list available IF we delist Garthwaite, which I suspect we will. It then depends if we plan on using 4 or 5 picks, I'd hazard a guess at 4 and then take 1 to the SSP / MSD which means we don't need that other pick this year.
Having a first and 3 2nds next year just means that again we will be able to take at last 4 (when we will have a high level of delisting / retirements) but able to take 4 inside the top 40. It also gives us a nice hand to potentially have conversations about trade targets, like someone like Taranto. I'd be happy to take 4 picks this year (7, 15, 26 and 28) and kick another 2nd into next year.
We had 40 but then it became 42 with the FA compo picks. 40 is the new 38
Clear as mud?
The numbers make my head spin, Mr P, but basically I’m getting that overall we came out ahead in the CCJ Tarrant deal.We had 40 but then it became 42 with the FA compo picks. 40 is the new 38
1st, 3 2nds, a 3rd, a 4th. 6. That’s enough. And it has to be a low end club too.
The Saints do need picks for their academy kids. I wonder if we'd consider 9 for 15 and 38. Is there enough benefit for us there? It might come down to if there are a lack of other options, we might do something like that.
Something similar could be with the Dogs, 23 for 28 and 40. If we can't use them to get another 2nd this year or next, then maybe this is a good way to use them, just get us a bit higher up the draft list being as we are unlikely to use either as a standalone pick at the draft.
Do both and we move 7,15, 26, 28, 38 and 40 to, 7, 9, 23 and 26.
Saints are the only 1 that really need to do it so it would be them IMO. I don't think they make finals next year.
Yeah I think so.
I've simplified it to this.
3 trades
Out CCJ and 47
In 2nd round pick next year
Out 42
In 40
Out Future 4th
In Tarrant
Very good deal consider Norf's posturing. That future second should be a pick in the early to mid 20s. Also keep the Chol compensation pick.
We're definitely trading up for another pick before 25 based on all our picks in the 30s and 40s.
We're definitely trading up for another pick before 25 based on all our picks in the 30s and 40s.
So, thats conceivably 29 if they finish 9th.
Cwood and Dogs are 25 and 29 this year. Meh.
