The Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation Thread [Merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

The Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation Thread [Merged]

Yes, in the last 24 hours I have found three errors in newspaper articles - and these are supposed to be the professionals. I have twice seen examples of ending a sentence with "in" and in Dean Jones' otherwise good article he spells Paul Sheahan "Sheehan".
All pretty disgraceful, really.
 
23.21.159 said:
Yes, in the last 24 hours I have found three errors in newspaper articles - and these are supposed to be the professionals. I have twice seen examples of ending a sentence with "in" and in Dean Jones' otherwise good article he spells Paul Sheahan "Sheehan".
All pretty disgraceful, really.

That sort of problem isn't the journalists fault but more the lack of copy editors.
 
For those that were taught the English language and not the North American version I find it really annoying that people are writing and say 'anyways' instead of just 'anyway'.

I also get annoyed by MS Word and this bloody iphone trying to correct my spelling of words like 'specialise' to use a 'z' in lieu of the 's' even with the language set at Australian English.
 
YinnarTiger said:
Another one that I haven't seen here but I've heard from a few young people who can derive a verb from a preposition eg in round 1 this year Richmond will verse Carlton. That would easily pass most spelling checkers.

Ha! My 14 y.o says that relentlessly!

14 year old ''Who are the Tigers versing this week''
Me ''do you mean who are they playing?''
14 y.o ''whatever''

Pokemon have a lot to answer for!
 
Sort of off track, but still interesting. This is from todays's NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/opinion/sunday/the-words-that-defined-2011.html?hpw
 
surely that was a joke?

As for "pronuncciation", ironically it's one of the most mispronounced and misspelt words in the language, but I've never seen it misspelt that way before.
 
23.21.159 said:
surely that was a joke?

As for "pronuncciation", ironically it's one of the most mispronounced and misspelt words in the language, but I've never seen it misspelt that way before.

People say it different ways:

a. Pro nunce ee achun

b. Pro nounce ee achun

c. Pruh nunce ee achun
 
Following the raft of criticism the terms “apostrophe” and “@myer_mystore” have trended on Twitter.

maybe it's because I don't use Twitter/Facebook, but when did "trended" become a word??? worse than "versing"
 
The caption under this photo is a disgrace:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/pictures/gallery-e6frf94x-1226311151422?page=14

I know I harp on about this a bit much. But this is the biggest newspaper in Australia. This is (supposedly) professional journalism, and it's where people should be able to learn correct grammar.

I asked my 17-year-old son to read it (and English is not even his first language), and he baulked as soon as he got to the error - spotting it straight away. Whoever wrote that caption should be utterly ashamed and/or sacked!
 
23.21.159 said:
The caption under this photo is a disgrace:

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/pictures/gallery-e6frf94x-1226311151422?page=14

I know I harp on about this a bit much. But this is the biggest newspaper in Australia. This is (supposedly) professional journalism, and it's where people should be able to learn correct grammar.

I asked my 17-year-old son to read it (and English is not even his first language), and he baulked as soon as he got to the error - spotting it straight away. Whoever wrote that caption should be utterly ashamed and/or sacked!

Well they have fixed it. The "their" was originally "there".
 
23.21.159 said:
Well they have fixed it. The "their" was originally "there".

It said their when I read it. I thought you were referring to a missing apostrophe in St Pauls.
 
Ha! It was definitely the THERE that I was complaining about but I did wonder about the St Paul's too. Wasn't 100% sure that was incorrect but on research I guess it is ....
 
Massive Tiger said:
I think St Pauls is OK. Common usage or some such rule

If common usage changes rules or names then most of the things mentioned on this thread would be acceptable.