I don’t totally agree with this . That’s the way we used to play to win, we were able to sacrifice winning clearances for winning the ball back on intercept/turnover and launching forward from there. These days with the stand rule the ability to do that is reduced, you need more than a turnover game.
Our problem now is that we don’t get enough first use from clearances around the ground. Whether Matt Crouch is the right player is up for debate but I do not agree that we don’t need to add a strong clearance mid. Doesn’t mean we don’t need 2 ways runners but we have to get players who can get the pill in clearance to give it to them.
I'm quite bullish that between Ross and Dow we will have enough pure extraction next year. (You can add Prestia, Dusty and maybe Cotchin too).
You're right though, if neither of the young kids come on, or if we lose Cotchy and Dusty, then we'll be light on there.
I disagree that the transition runners game had become less important. I'd say it's almost more critical with the ball in motion more. Our game plan still revolves around turnover, just further up the ground. We still attack on the counter. You only need to look at how much better we are this year whenever Lambert managed to play.
I just don't see Crouch as really adding anything, and I do see his limitations.