Talking Politics | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Talking Politics

If you purchase anything from a company some of that money is going towards political donations if that company pursues that. If you work for a company then some of the profits generated from your work is going towards political donations.
Yes. So it is up to shareholders to make that point. I’ve been at AGMs when that has been raised and directors just say they believe donations are in the best interests of shareholders. Which may well be true in the case of those companies
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Yes. So it is up to shareholders to make that point. I’ve been at AGMs when that has been raised and directors just say they believe donations are in the best interests of shareholders. Which may well be true in the case of those companies
The amount ASX companies donate wouldn't cover a third tier executive salary.
So you could argue
1) getting influence over government comes remarkably cheap (in shareholders interest)
2) and even if it doesn't achieve anything the impact on profit is a drop in the ocean.

Seems to be some consensus that politicians should not be influenced ... I want them to listen... To individuals, community groups, welfare lobbies, professional associations, yes even big huge whopping businesses who employ and serve and profit Australians.
 
If you purchase anything from a company some of that money is going towards political donations if that company pursues that. If you work for a company then some of the profits generated from your work is going towards political donations.
And if those donations are effective they lead to better returns for the company thus better prospects for their employees. (Reg we want to give you a pay rise as you will be a lot busier now we can export more due to the new trade agreement the govt signed with India. Eff off boss I don't want your bribes, you give money to the Liberals.)
 
Yes. So it is up to shareholders to make that point. I’ve been at AGMs when that has been raised and di
Laura Tingle is great. Super smart and to the point.
Not going to argue if she is or isn't smart, but occurred to me that in paying a compliment to a male journalist few would reference their intelligence even if it was in the super smart category.
 
Farewell Dim Tim.

Took a few nudges but he finally got the hint.
Nudged the bottle
Nudged the wall
Got nudged toward the door n finally exiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
The amount ASX companies donate wouldn't cover a third tier executive salary.
So you could argue
1) getting influence over government comes remarkably cheap (in shareholders interest)
2) and even if it doesn't achieve anything the impact on profit is a drop in the ocean.

Seems to be some consensus that politicians should not be influenced ... I want them to listen... To individuals, community groups, welfare lobbies, professional associations, yes even big huge whopping businesses who employ and serve and profit Australians.
All that is most probably true
The couple of agitated shareholders making comments that I have heard is when a company donates to one political party but not any other and it is not about the amount but the perception. Some shareholders feel that the job of a company is not to favour a political party and donating to one creates that impression.
I also feel that the reason why some donate equally to both LNP and ALP is to make sure that impression does not get created and that the extra amount, although potentially wasted, is important so not to create a perceived position of political bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Took a few nudges but he finally got the hint.
Nudged the bottle
Nudged the wall
Got nudged toward the door n finally exiting.
Watch him get some nice cozy positions from his mates. He will end up on a few public sector boards and a think tank or two just to cushion the blow a little
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Watch him get some nice cozy positions from his mates. He will end up on a few public sector boards and a think tank or two just to cushion the blow a little
Yep. That happens with just about all pollies from especially the major parties. Plenty of backside wiping to keep the departing team members feeling much loved.
 
Yes. So it is up to shareholders to make that point. I’ve been at AGMs when that has been raised and directors just say they believe donations are in the best interests of shareholders. Which may well be true in the case of those companies

True Sin. I'm sure that unions would make the same case with greater meaning given companies tend to donate to both parties.
 
If this is true regarding red shirts Dan Andrews should be in trouble (and asked to stand down) as he has always stated that he didn’t know about it until after the election. Very huge if though with this bloke. So probably unlikely to be true.