Talking Politics | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Talking Politics

Ssssweetie the figures are correct.
Oh and by the way shows on the ABC and SBS as well as articles in the papers all pointing to how the gap between ordinary Aussies and housing affordability are continuing to widen. Might want to pop the head up out of the sand every now and then.
 
Anduril said:
Ssssweetie the figures are correct.
Oh and by the way shows on the ABC and SBS as well as articles in the papers all pointing to how the gap between ordinary Aussies and housing affordability are continuing to widen. Might want to pop the head up out of the sand every now and then.
:hihi :hihi if your gunna quote the abc and sbs i might as well pull quotes outa just life.. and by the way an ostrich pulls it's head outa the sand to the left only. true fact i seen it on a doco on Absolutey Bulltish Crew
 
Anduril said:
Liverpool said:
Also...just over one year of the new IR laws "Workchoices

Yes and women are 10% worse off in wages and salary conditions. (But then again the LIbs have never really cared about women unless they have a husband and are producing babies.)

Are you including those bloody sheila tennis players in that, who only play best of 3 and get paid the same as the blokes?
Terrible conditions those.... ;D

Gypsy__Jazz said:
Liverpool said:
Also...just over one year of the new IR laws "Workchoices".....still waiting for all the mass sackings to start, etc... :p

Sorry to mention this Livers... but your party's IR laws are extremely unpopular (refer to polls).

Is this the same polls that thought Latham was home and hosed? ::)


The question I put forward to all of you, is how has the new Workchoices/IR-laws affected YOU?

The fact that "the polls" are saying this shows more that people (especially Joe Blow on the production floor) are not educated properly in what is going on, and that the Unions have conducted a fantastic scare campaign.

A good example happened to me today, where one of my staff came into my office, and asked for a written reference, in case he got the sack...."You know, with all these new IR laws, I just want to have some insurance towards my next job."
I told him that the new IR laws do not cover our company, due to a few factors, and that he was safe....he was o.k and went back to work.

Too many people out there just believe what the union and its members are saying on the job, and not asking more questions.......hence whyt he polls are leaning towards 'against' ont he topic of the IR laws.
 
Liverpool said:
The question I put forward to all of you, is how has the new Workchoices/IR-laws affected YOU?

I love them. Workchoices and the advent of the ABCC have been a godsend for the construction industry. Even if Ruddy gets in pretty sure the ABCC will still be around for some time. The construction industry in Melbourne hasn't looked better since I started working in it.
 
jb03 said:
Liverpool said:
The question I put forward to all of you, is how has the new Workchoices/IR-laws affected YOU?

I love them. Workchoices and the advent of the ABCC have been a godsend for the construction industry. Even if Ruddy gets in pretty sure the ABCC will still be around for some time. The construction industry in Melbourne hasn't looked better since I started working in it.

JB03,
I haven't heard one thing from anyone I know, regarding a drop in pay or an unfair dismissal, and like you, it seems to be a good thing, if anything.
Of course, the hardline lefts will protest, purely because it was the Libs idea and the Unions will protest, as this is a chance for them to try and boost their waning numbers.

I will be interested in what the hardline left, ALP voters, and the unions will say/do, if Ruddy keeps the laws, or only modifies them slightly?
"Bring back Beazley!" will be the cry, I'm tipping.... :hihi


Kevin Rudd union clash looms
Ben Packham

March 28, 2007 12:00am

KEVIN Rudd may be on a collision course with trade unions over his plans to embrace business.
Included in the Opposition Leader's plans is creating the Building Australia Fund, a national infrastructure fund based on Treasurer Peter Costello's Future Fund.
Income generated from the fund would be used to finance major projects, such as Labor's broadband internet initiative.
A policy blueprint to be put before next month's Labor conference says its main priority is to foster enterprise and innovation.
The document confirms Australian Workplace Agreements would be axed under Labor. But it doesn't commit Labor to the full reintroduction of unfair dismissal laws, saying the needs of business would be considered


http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21459541-661,00.html
 
The key point to keep in mind though is that the battles are no longer fought on facts, they are fought on the perceptions that can be developed in the minds of the electorate. The Howard administration oversaw that when manipulating the electorate with lies about refugee seekers throwing children overboard and ephemeral, unprovable suggestions that rates would be higher under a theoretical Labor government. Howard has made the battles about abstractions and fears, Labor and the union movement would be absolutely stupid to shoot themselves in the foot by fighting from the moral high ground.

Politics is grubby, I'm not sure why the Howard apologists act so surpised when the left recycles his tactics.
 
It is interesting to see the new government fear campaign is along the lines of 'omg Labor state and federal governments will raise the GST!!!11'. I was expecting them to play the 'all states have Labor governments' card.
 
mld said:
It is interesting to see the new government fear campaign is along the lines of 'omg Labor state and federal governments will raise the GST!!!11'. I was expecting them to play the 'all states have Labor governments' card.

Every party uses the 'checks and balances' argument when it suits them. Be it house of reps versus senate, states versus Canberra. I mean as if Labour wouldn't say exactly the same thing if rolls were reversed.
 
The new workplace laws have not affected me or anyone that I know in the slightest. For mine, to this stage, it has been a storm in a teacup. I also reckon that the Libs are doing a pretty good job at present, not perfect, but pretty good, so I see no need to change. I can also remember my parents having to sell our farm as the interest rates under the labour goverment at the time were closing in on 20%. We were paying $200,000 a year in interest alone! Having to sell everything you have to pay off your debts because of economic mismanagement is not something you forget quickly.
I am glad, however, that Labour finally have a respectable leader at long last and if Kevin Rudd became Prime Minister I would not be too upset. I am also pleased that he is a committed Christian as I think it is important for our country to maintain the values and belief systems it was founded on, particulalry as I heard a stat yesterday that 25% of current Australians were not actually born in Australia.
 
One of my neighbours got sacked from his business because he refused to sign an AWA.

Nice choice!
 
mld said:
The key point to keep in mind though is that the battles are no longer fought on facts, they are fought on the perceptions that can be developed in the minds of the electorate. The Howard administration oversaw that when manipulating the electorate with lies about refugee seekers throwing children overboard and ephemeral, unprovable suggestions that rates would be higher under a theoretical Labor government. Howard has made the battles about abstractions and fears, Labor and the union movement would be absolutely stupid to shoot themselves in the foot by fighting from the moral high ground.

Politics is grubby, I'm not sure why the Howard apologists act so surpised when the left recycles his tactics.

Great post, MLD.
 
jb03 said:
Liverpool said:
The question I put forward to all of you, is how has the new Workchoices/IR-laws affected YOU?

I love them. Workchoices and the advent of the ABCC have been a godsend for the construction industry. Even if Ruddy gets in pretty sure the ABCC will still be around for some time. The construction industry in Melbourne hasn't looked better since I started working in it.

Interesting. Raises a lot of issues I'd like to know more about. A lot of people said at the time, me included, that Howard was very astute in bringing in these laws during low unemployment, a worker with any desired skill has some power for obvious reasons, and can get decent dough. Do you reckon this is a factor JB?

related question, would you reckon people with specialist skills wages have gone up or stayed the same, while sh!ttkickers have gone down? I'd like to hear any other observations you have.

I'll be interested in your views on this. In a strong economy nothing much changes. When I was tradesman in the boom 80s I earned good dough, well above award, when the recession hit, it was a 15% pay cut for all even though our firm was doing well, because others weren't, and stiff cheese (backfired though because their 3 best tradesmen left, including me, other 2 were standout best). My own hunch is that in a downturn, when workers have no power and find their minimum standards have eroded, the sh!t would hit the fan. It may never happen, but I think it will.
 
tigersnake said:
jb03 said:
Liverpool said:
The question I put forward to all of you, is how has the new Workchoices/IR-laws affected YOU?

I love them. Workchoices and the advent of the ABCC have been a godsend for the construction industry. Even if Ruddy gets in pretty sure the ABCC will still be around for some time. The construction industry in Melbourne hasn't looked better since I started working in it.

Interesting. Raises a lot of issues I'd like to know more about. A lot of people said at the time, me included, that Howard was very astute in bringing in these laws during low unemployment, a worker with any desired skill has some power for obvious reasons, and can get decent dough. Do you reckon this is a factor JB?

related question, would you reckon people with specialist skills wages have gone up or stayed the same, while sh!ttkickers have gone down? I'd like to hear any other observations you have.

I'll be interested in your views on this. In a strong economy nothing much changes. When I was tradesman in the boom 80s I earned good dough, well above award, when the recession hit, it was a 15% pay cut for all even though our firm was doing well, because others weren't, and stiff cheese (backfired though because their 3 best tradesmen left, including me, other 2 were standout best). My own hunch is that in a downturn, when workers have no power and find their minimum standards have eroded, the sh!t would hit the fan. It may never happen, but I think it will.

As sure as there is *smile* in a cat - there will be a downturn and every worker will feel the brunt of it - whereas those in management and middle management will not.

However - on the election - history shows that political parties lose government they do not win government - in other words the governing party has to really stuff up and whilst I believe John Howard has stuffed up he has created the perception that he has not.

I think he will be returned with a very much reduced majority - but this is only my opnion - what crisis on both sides of the house happen over the next few months will have a large bearing on the outcome. Hope there is a big *smile* fight hit the fan on Little Johnny's side - just to make it extremely interesting.......RT
 
tigersnake said:
jb03 said:
Liverpool said:
The question I put forward to all of you, is how has the new Workchoices/IR-laws affected YOU?

I love them. Workchoices and the advent of the ABCC have been a godsend for the construction industry. Even if Ruddy gets in pretty sure the ABCC will still be around for some time. The construction industry in Melbourne hasn't looked better since I started working in it.

Interesting. Raises a lot of issues I'd like to know more about. A lot of people said at the time, me included, that Howard was very astute in bringing in these laws during low unemployment, a worker with any desired skill has some power for obvious reasons, and can get decent dough. Do you reckon this is a factor JB?

related question, would you reckon people with specialist skills wages have gone up or stayed the same, while sh!ttkickers have gone down? I'd like to hear any other observations you have.

I'll be interested in your views on this. In a strong economy nothing much changes. When I was tradesman in the boom 80s I earned good dough, well above award, when the recession hit, it was a 15% pay cut for all even though our firm was doing well, because others weren't, and stiff cheese (backfired though because their 3 best tradesmen left, including me, other 2 were standout best). My own hunch is that in a downturn, when workers have no power and find their minimum standards have eroded, the sh!t would hit the fan. It may never happen, but I think it will.

I would love to chat at length with you snake man, it's a complex issue that my fingers can't type quick enough to discuss in words. Suffice to say, I come from a management position hence the advent of the ABCC, moreso than the WorkChoices legislation has been a key factor in improving the functionality of the building industry to a point I not thought possible. Our workers are still very well paid and we look after them. No one has quit, no one has been fired. The sh!t workers are still the sh!t workers and the good ones still good. We have skilled labourers and some just out of jail.

Lost time has fallen by a gazillion per cent but remarkably, safety incidents have also fallen. Safety is not the domain purely of the Unions as they would have you believe.

What has ceased is the standover tactics employed by the CFMEU for years and the ability to hide behind vague clauses of the OH&S Act.

Our workers outwardly seem happier than previously and the boys on site are still getting a barbie on the Thursday prior to Good Friday.

If there is a downturn, as in any industry and at any level of employment, those overpaid or not value for money will be the first to go. But this is not purely the domain of the blue collar worker. Many companies are stacked with middle management white collar workers that pretty much do jack sh!t - they will also be the first to go in a downturn.

Having said all that, I have a gut feel (but don't know for fact) the average worker in the construction industry is likely to be in a far better position compared to other industries through the previous strong stance of the Unions and the current EBA that exists between respective parties of the industry.
 
jb03 said:
tigersnake said:
jb03 said:
Liverpool said:
The question I put forward to all of you, is how has the new Workchoices/IR-laws affected YOU?

I love them. Workchoices and the advent of the ABCC have been a godsend for the construction industry. Even if Ruddy gets in pretty sure the ABCC will still be around for some time. The construction industry in Melbourne hasn't looked better since I started working in it.

Interesting. Raises a lot of issues I'd like to know more about. A lot of people said at the time, me included, that Howard was very astute in bringing in these laws during low unemployment, a worker with any desired skill has some power for obvious reasons, and can get decent dough. Do you reckon this is a factor JB?

related question, would you reckon people with specialist skills wages have gone up or stayed the same, while sh!ttkickers have gone down? I'd like to hear any other observations you have.

I'll be interested in your views on this. In a strong economy nothing much changes. When I was tradesman in the boom 80s I earned good dough, well above award, when the recession hit, it was a 15% pay cut for all even though our firm was doing well, because others weren't, and stiff cheese (backfired though because their 3 best tradesmen left, including me, other 2 were standout best). My own hunch is that in a downturn, when workers have no power and find their minimum standards have eroded, the sh!t would hit the fan. It may never happen, but I think it will.

I would love to chat at length with you snake man, it's a complex issue that my fingers can't type quick enough to discuss in words. Suffice to say, I come from a management position hence the advent of the ABCC, moreso than the WorkChoices legislation has been a key factor in improving the functionality of the building industry to a point I not thought possible. Our workers are still very well paid and we look after them. No one has quit, no one has been fired. The sh!t workers are still the sh!t workers and the good ones still good. We have skilled labourers and some just out of jail.

Lost time has fallen by a gazillion per cent but remarkably, safety incidents have also fallen. Safety is not the domain purely of the Unions as they would have you believe.

What has ceased is the standover tactics employed by the CFMEU for years and the ability to hide behind vague clauses of the OH&S Act.

Our workers outwardly seem happier than previously and the boys on site are still getting a barbie on the Thursday prior to Good Friday.

If there is a downturn, as in any industry and at any level of employment, those overpaid or not value for money will be the first to go. But this is not purely the domain of the blue collar worker. Many companies are stacked with middle management white collar workers that pretty much do jack sh!t - they will also be the first to go in a downturn.

Having said all that, I have a gut feel (but don't know for fact) the average worker in the construction industry is likely to be in a far better position compared to other industries through the previous strong stance of the Unions and the current EBA that exists between respective parties of the industry.

JB03,

I echo your sentiments 100%.....you just saved me a lot of typing, and probably said it more eloquently than I as well.... :clap
 
very intersting again jb. more insights than i've been able to get in the media. It sounds complex as you say, on the one hand union has been overzealous, on the other its strong past stance have paved the way for decent conditions now.

When I said 'shitkicker' I actually meant unskilled labourer rather than *smile* worker. Does that alter your answer?