Albo latest turn off YOUR phone for 5 minutes a day.. How did we end up with him ?. Australia only counrty that has a preferential voting system therefore the person with most votes does not win so usually the dumbo who comes second wins. They were once just Labor candidates but now we have Greenies & Teals who cannot determine the difference between being first past the post or a loser.
Thats not even true. There are many countries that operate a preferential voting system, just I think we are the only ones that do it in 1 night.
There are many others that operate with run offs, ie. they drop candidates off when they don't garner x% of the vote, with the aim that the next vote gets a candidate that gets over 50% of the vote. Thats what they are aiming for, they want 50% of the population to make the call as to who is the ruling party, not as the first past the post does, and just accumulates the one with the highest single tally.
For example, in Davids example, only 1/3rd of voters ultimately had their say in who won, as opposed to using preferences to determine who the majority want to win, should their preferred party not come out on top.
The french is a good example of this. A few years ago, there was a bit of a vocal push for a protest vote, and Marine Le Pens National Front party had the most amount of votes and would have won the election in a first past the post vote (from memory she got somewhere between 35-40% of the vote). Runoffs occurred and she ended up losing, the majority of people didn't want a racist running their country.
Preferential voting isn't perfect, but as a democratic voting system, its far more democratic than a first past the post solution.