Stengle | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Stengle

I doubt they give up Ellis-Yolman as a direct swap for Stengle. He's just come off his best season averaging 20 touches, 5 clearances, 5 tackles and 3 i50s a game. I suspect we would need to give up a pick as well. Not a bad option for us though, would more than compensate for the loss of Conca
 
As a 2nd year rookie he can walk to Crows as a delisted free agent so I wouldnt be expecting much from this scenario.
 
Macca68 said:
As a 2nd year rookie he can walk to Crows as a delisted free agent so I wouldnt be expecting much from this scenario.
Click to expand...

Maybe a very late future pick?
 
Macca68 said:
As a 2nd year rookie he can walk to Crows as a delisted free agent so I wouldnt be expecting much from this scenario.
Click to expand...

Not a Rookie and won't be delisted.
http://m.richmondfc.com.au/news/2017-06-15/stengle-elevated.mobileapp
 
FistFullOfDollars said:
Not a Rookie and won't be delisted.
http://m.richmondfc.com.au/news/2017-06-15/stengle-elevated.mobileapp
Click to expand...

I think that was a temporary elevation for a long term injury.

This page suggests he's still a rookie: http://www.richmondfc.com.au/players/rookie-players
 
BrisTiger24 said:
I think that was a temporary elevation for a long term injury.

This page suggests he's still a rookie: http://www.richmondfc.com.au/players/rookie-players
Click to expand...

My bad you're right.
 
BrisTiger24 said:
I think that was a temporary elevation for a long term injury.

This page suggests he's still a rookie: http://www.richmondfc.com.au/players/rookie-players
Click to expand...
I thought that the rookie rules changed this year.

My understanding is that a rookie can play any number of games without having to wait for an injury to occur.

I could be wrong and it 's a moot point anyway as he's gone
 
ahyeahnah said:
I thought that the rookie rules changed this year.

My understanding is that a rookie can play any number of games without having to wait for an injury to occur.

I could be wrong and it 's a moot point anyway as he's gone
Click to expand...

That's right, rookies could play AFL games without being elevated etc. 2017, the elevation rule still applied. For 2018, he was a rookie for the entire year.
 
I think pick 37 is fair ! has been the system for 2 years developing and is ready for senior footy
 
Tommy H said:
Big mistake letting him go and keeping Shai. Big mistake.
Click to expand...

I don't think it is a case of letting go ,they have offered a longer contract & it happens to be from his home town.
 
French Tiger said:
I don't think it is a case of letting go ,they have offered a longer contract & it happens to be from his home town.
Click to expand...


If we wanted to keep him we would.
 
Tommy H said:
Big mistake letting him go and keeping Shai. Big mistake.
Click to expand...

my left nut is actually an RFC superball,

and I'll stake it that $hai plays 3 times as many AFL games as Tyson.
 
Slow, small brutally good clearance inside mid I get. Slow, small forward I don't. On the face of it you would have to think Shai has a better chance of making it than Stengle. However like Griffiths vs Vickery, reasonable chance that both will fail to get there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
< Changes V Eagles | Sam Lloyd >
Official PRE merch now on Redbubble!
Top Bottom