Round 14: the badly poured beer games. | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Round 14: the badly poured beer games.

I can see how they miss the daicos dropping ball - mm in it

But the two collingwood player rushed 10m over the mark for the non 50

How do you get that so wrong?
Ahhh, was that the common sense rule coming into play.
 
Apprantly they are saying he wouldve paid 50 but he played on
Absolute bullshiit
Total opposite of what actually happened. They ran over the mark anticipating he would play on, but he hadn't and the ump hasn't called play on. Thats why the rule is there! Truly amazing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Phillips blanketed Nick Daicos for 3 quarters but Clarke subbed him off at 3/4 time. Daicos went berserk in last quarter while Phillips sat on the bench. They said on telecast he wasn’t injured.

Any of the journos ask supercoach Clarko why he made that move?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Phillips blanketed Nick Daicos for 3 quarters but Clarke subbed him off at 3/4 time. Daicos went berserk in last quarter while Phillips sat on the bench. They said on telecast he wasn’t injured.

Any of the journos ask supercoach Clarko why he made that move?
1st pick
 
I guess I’m naive but I’m amazed there’s no uproar from all the clubs about the standard of umpiring and how ridiculous the different interpretations are from one game to the next. Everyone is on the receiving end of this rough pineapple at some stage. They ought to be united on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I guess I’m naive but I’m amazed there’s no uproar from all the clubs about the standard of umpiring and how ridiculous the different interpretations are from one game to the next. Everyone is on the receiving end of this rough pineapple at some stage. They ought to be united on this.
They know better than to **** with city hall
 
Only people that choked harder than North in that last quarter were the Umpires.

No 50 in that marking contest was disgraceful, but wait for it.... will be ticked off by Laura.

Common sense rule?

Funny how I can never find that rule in the AFL published rule book :unsure:

DS
 
Why, though?
A myriad of reasons.

Some clubs still live off the AFL’s teat so would have no interest in biting the hand that feeds them.

Others will have executive level staff that don’t want to have doors firmly shut for sideways or upward cushy career moves into the AFL *smile* house.

Having the AFL’s ‘accredited propagandists’ write stories about how certain coaches or officials are whingers for having the temerity to speak frankly about obviously incompetent decisions would stop some in their tracks.

Or just knowing that all they’ll get in return is a statement the equivalent of ‘these are not the droids you’re looking for’ would create a certain level of ambivalence you would think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
If I was a North fan, Clarkson's presser would've made me want to vomit.

Had a real 'who cares' vibe to it, with pats on the back for a good effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I guess I’m naive but I’m amazed there’s no uproar from all the clubs about the standard of umpiring and how ridiculous the different interpretations are from one game to the next. Everyone is on the receiving end of this rough pineapple at some stage. They ought to be united on this.
Said it once and I'll say it again - how the hell can the umpires of the peak tier of competition for a sporting code only be part-time employees? It's farcical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
If I was a North fan, Clarkson's presser would've made me want to vomit.

Had a real 'who cares' vibe to it, with pats on the back for a good effort.
Agree. Did a Dimma backing the flogs and how hard their work is. He was right in saying it was their own fault choking but still a lost opportunity in the last seconds should be questioned. Maybe he knows you can't win.
 
Total opposite of what actually happened. They ran over the mark anticipating he would play on, but he hadn't and the ump hasn't called play on. Thats why the rule is there! Truly amazing
AFL will tick it off as usual.
Just send the same old document out. Just change the date on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Agree. Did a Dimma backing the flogs and how hard their work is. He was right in saying it was their own fault choking but still a lost opportunity in the last seconds should be questioned. Maybe he knows you can't win.
Clarkson had money on Collingwobbles
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
A myriad of reasons.

Some clubs still live off the AFL’s teat so would have no interest in biting the hand that feeds them.

Others will have executive level staff that don’t want to have doors firmly shut for sideways or upward cushy career moves into the AFL *smile* house.

Having the AFL’s ‘accredited propagandists’ write stories about how certain coaches or officials are whingers for having the temerity to speak frankly about obviously incompetent decisions would stop some in their tracks.

Or just knowing that all they’ll get in return is a statement the equivalent of ‘these are not the droids you’re looking for’ would create a certain level of ambivalence you would think.
It stinks. But thanks, good answer.