bullus_hit said:ESSENDON
48. Ryley Stoddart
67. Will Walker
85. Cam Ellis-Yolman
Tough to make a silk purse with these picks but I think the Bombers have done a pretty good job in extracting value with their first two picks. Stoddart is more a second rounder for mine, Walker possibly a third rounder. Having recently watched Stoddart perform in the All-Stars game I was really impressed with his run and carry, he's a play-maker and has the evasion to pull off daring runs when an opening presents itself. With Saad coming into the side he'll probably find himself serving a decent apprenticeship but given he's light a stint in the VFL looks absolutely necessary. Will Walker had a really good TAC season and impressed during the finals, probably needs to focus on the kicking efficiency but provides plenty of scoreboard pressure. Ellis-Yolman is done for me as an AFL footballer, was never that impressed to begin with but if we're talking SANFL rejects then I'd be more inclined to grab Magarey medalist Mitch Grigg. Overall a pretty good job.
Grade: B+
too highbullus_hit said:10. Carlton - Nick Coffield
too high12. Richmond - Patrick Naish
too low13. Adelaide - Jack Higgins
too low16. Brisbane Lions - Noah Balta
too high23. North Melbourne - Ed Richards
too high25. Richmond - Sam Hayes
too high31. Melbourne - Toby Wooller
absolute steal!66. Fremantle - Jack Roughsedge
bullus_hit said:FREMANTLE
2. Paddy Dow
5. Andrew Brayshaw
42. Andrew McPherson
60. Ben Miller
71. Haiden Schloithe
79. Scott Jones
83. Jye Bolton
......
Grade: B
I've watched him play in championship games this year too and I don't buy him at all. I've watched Ballenden too,as that my job ay ProScout, but I don't recall him playing down back for any extended period. All my notes are on him playing Ruck/forward. The Allies played Jack Payne and Brander at KPB until Brander got chopped up by Lukosuis and they then put him forward where, in my opinion, he should play. The Tassie kids are better in next years crop, I did like Jake Hinds but he seemed to slip out of contention, although I think he is a Houli type.bullus_hit said:Some good highlights of Hugh Dixon in this clip, takes a good hanger at the 2.50 minute mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELMR2E_Efdw&t=183s
evo said:these are the players I know a fair bit about. All of them I've seen for years and coached against or my son played with
too hightoo hightoo lowtoo lowtoo hightoo hightoo highabsolute steal!
Ballendon played chb for allies v WA and was clearly their standout player on a day when he had a lot of work to do . His intercept marking rebound and disposal was duly noted by the the 30 or so of your peers who were at the ground that dayTails said:I've watched him play in championship games this year too and I don't buy him at all. I've watched Ballenden too,as that my job ay ProScout, but I don't recall him playing down back for any extended period. All my notes are on him playing Ruck/forward. The Allies played Jack Payne and Brander at KPB until Brander got chopped up by Lukosuis and they then put him forward where, in my opinion, he should play. The Tassie kids are better in next years crop, I did like Jake Hinds but he seemed to slip out of contention, although I think he is a Houli type.
evo said:these are the players I know a fair bit about. All of them I've seen for years and coached against or my son played with
too hightoo hightoo lowtoo lowtoo hightoo hightoo highabsolute steal!
Yes well as I'm in NSW that game was not in my brief, however Ballenden has not played in the backline since that one out game and I have watched most of his Championship & NEAFL games.Kaelan said:Ballendon played chb for allies v WA and was clearly their standout player on a day when he had a lot of work to do . His intercept marking rebound and disposal was duly noted by the the 30 or so of your peers who were at the ground that day
Ballendon also played CHB in the allies win over Vic metroTails said:Yes well as I'm in NSW that game was not in my brief, however Ballenden has not played in the backline since that one out game and I have watched most of his Championship & NEAFL games.
Tails said:I've watched him play in championship games this year too and I don't buy him at all. I've watched Ballenden too,as that my job ay ProScout, but I don't recall him playing down back for any extended period. All my notes are on him playing Ruck/forward. The Allies played Jack Payne and Brander at KPB until Brander got chopped up by Lukosuis and they then put him forward where, in my opinion, he should play. The Tassie kids are better in next years crop, I did like Jake Hinds but he seemed to slip out of contention, although I think he is a Houli type.
Brodders17 said:Thanks for the feedback. You did miss Roughsedge at 66.
I agree Bolton wont be drafted, maybe as a rookie.
Freo have a few promising young tall defenders, but little up front. Miller may end up a KPF. he wont be a ruck.
My 1st 2 picks didnt end up how I wanted. I wanted Rayner to go at 1 so I could get LUD. then I wanted Stephenson to go 4 so I could get Cerra.
Rayner and Stephenson may end up the best 2 in the draft, or they could end up ordinary. Freo needed to draft players they know will be 200 gamers.
They can draft more speculatively with the high picks they will continue to get over the next few years.
bullus_hit said:GOLD COAST
19. Callum Coleman-Jones
41. Brett Bewley
50. Brayden Crossley
52. Brandon Starcevich
76. Jack Payne
This batch looks like a bit of a dogs breakfast to me. My first reaction was to question why you have picked two ruckman when Jarrod Witts has a mortgage on the first ruck duties. On top of that I see Coleman-Jones as an early third rounder to rookie pick. At this selection you could have addressed just about any other position yet you targeted an area of minimal importance. At 41 you've gone early on a state leaguer and I daresay that if Bewley gets drafted it will be much later than this. At 50 you have selected a guy who is an GC academy player and someone you could have matched at pick 76. Meanwhile bargains like Ballard have fallen into the lap of the Tigers. Starcevich was probably the best pick out of this lot and despite needing some work on the tank he shows a bit of promise. Jack Payne could have and should have been matched as Brisbane have delisted 12 players and still have 4 spots left..........so be grateful for small mercies.
Grade: D+
Woo hoo! A D+! I usually get Fs so I’ll take it!bullus_hit said:GOLD COAST
19. Callum Coleman-Jones
41. Brett Bewley
50. Brayden Crossley
52. Brandon Starcevich
76. Jack Payne
This batch looks like a bit of a dogs breakfast to me. My first reaction was to question why you have picked two ruckman when Jarrod Witts has a mortgage on the first ruck duties. On top of that I see Coleman-Jones as an early third rounder to rookie pick. At this selection you could have addressed just about any other position yet you targeted an area of minimal importance. At 41 you've gone early on a state leaguer and I daresay that if Bewley gets drafted it will be much later than this. At 50 you have selected a guy who is an GC academy player and someone you could have matched at pick 76. Meanwhile bargains like Ballard have fallen into the lap of the Tigers. Starcevich was probably the best pick out of this lot and despite needing some work on the tank he shows a bit of promise. Jack Payne could have and should have been matched as Brisbane have delisted 12 players and still have 4 spots left..........so be grateful for small mercies.
Grade: D+
bullus_hit said:GEELONG
22. Matthew Ling
24. Joel Garner
35. Oscar Clavarino
58. Charlie Spargo
72. Hayden McLean
90. Sam Collins
At 22 the Cats have picked up Matthew Ling which seems to me just about right, O'Brien went the pick before and that's how I expect it will go in the real deal. Whilst Ling isn't as quick as O'Brien he does appear to glide over the turf and provides plenty of run and carry. Joel Garner is a guy I rate very highly, first round quality and I wouldn't be upset if Richmond calls his name if Balta & Allen are off the board. Leadership is a tough quality to measure but one senses Garner will be a bit of a general once he hits the field. Aside from that he possesses that rare quality of having time when the situation appears chaotic. I've mentioned in other posts that I see a lot of Corey Enright in the way Garner plays and whoever grabs him in the real deal will be getting a beautifully composed footballer. Oscar Clavarino is another I rate, at times he's a dead ringer for Harry Taylor and despite looking more like a third tall at times, his anticipation is generally excellent. I have also noted he's grown 5cm this year so there's nothing to suggest he can't nail down centre half back with a few seasons under his belt.
The speculative picks are also spot on, I realise many people have Spargo going in the second round but for me this is his range. He may well turn out to be an AFL regular but at 171cm I think he's too short to be a permanent midfielder. With his elite agility he could slot in nicely as a defensive forward pocket. Mclean is another I like and his testing at the combine confirmed to me that he has the athletic profile to be a very handy forward/ruck. His TAC form was a little bit underwhelming but he played a decent game in the grand final curtain raiser kicking 4 goals. Surprised to see Sam Collins delisted by Freo so wouldn't be surprised to see him get a second shot.
Grade: A
Thanks Bully. I was pretty pleased with who was available at my picks as I’d only prepared a list of 40-odd but players from this were available at both 58 & 72. At 25 I had a choice between Garner and Petrucelle, which I really hope happens in the real thing as (barring a Naish bid) Richmond could choose whoever was left and I reckon both of them would suit us pretty well. Clavarino caught my eye at the state championship, surprised he hasn’t been more highly rated. Spargo I reckon probably goes in the 30’s or 40’s. McLean is speculative, but well worth the risk.