Pick 17, 20 & 25 | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Pick 17, 20 & 25

DirtyDogTiger said:
Gave up 15 for 20 & 25.

If it’s even after 10 then we’ve given ourselves an extra early pick.
I still cant see how 20 & 25 is better then 15 & 17
If someone bids before pick ten we are going to have to use pick 15 anyway, however if they dont we will still have 15 & 17 and get naish later. Baffles me this trade
 
It's appropriate that we have Pick 17 in 2017, a premiership year for the Tigers. I'm calling it now. Based on all the omens to have come so far this year, I'm tipping our Pick 17 to be a Brownlow Medallist.
 
Ok position to be in provided Balta is still onboard. My picks from here would be Balta, Allen & Worpel. Unlikely because Naish will get a bid in the top 25. Others I like are Miers, Clavarino, McLean & Wooller.
 
ToraToraTora said:
We’ve just won a flag. Recruiting dept can do whatever it likes.
Yeah, nah.

Attitudes like this will send you straight back down the ladder.
 
Shame that the other pick shuffles makes the Geelong trade look quite bad (bringing in an unneeded pick in a weak draft). Should be some useful talls available around these picks - Balta (hopefully), Petty, Coleman-Jones, Clavarino.
 
DirtyDogTiger said:
It gives us 3 picks in the top 25 which is pretty good for the best team in a comp of 18.

agree.

If we can steal a kid like jack graham in the 50's, it should be like shelling peas inside 25.
 
easy said:
agree.

If we can steal a kid like jack graham in the 50's, it should be like shelling peas inside 25.
Its not entirely about who you pick in the 50's but more about who everyone else has passed on.
 
tigerhalsey said:
I still cant see how 20 & 25 is better then 15 & 17
If someone bids before pick ten we are going to have to use pick 15 anyway, however if they dont we will still have 15 & 17 and get naish later. Baffles me this trade

No it's 17, 20 & 25 verses 15 & 17 - that looks very different.

They obviously don't think Naish will be bid on before pick 17 and they must think the talent is pretty even around those picks.

We won't know till after the draft.
 
No doubt a very boring trade period for us , however to be Premiers, lose no player of value on the list, have a solid amount of roar youngsters with potential and to be hitting a solid draft ( recruiters words) with 3 picks in the top 25, along with a well credentialed F/S , I think things are pretty solid at Punt road right now.