Ok, let's look at the actual rules as published by the clowns at the AFL:
Under section 18.3 Prohibited Contact it states:
The words "incidental", "accidental"and "in play" are nowhere to be seen.
The umpires and the AFL are telling porkies.
Under reportable offences we have the following:
Note the wording: intentionally or carelessly striking another person.
How was that not an intentional or careless striking of another person?
There is a simple answer to this: it wasn't.
The AFL can't even follow their own rules, and they wonder why they lack credibility. They just make it up as it suits as they go.
What a f***en joke, disgusting.
DS
Sadly when one of the AFL's love children commit an offence like the one in question mere rules will not apply. It is a systematic problem within the AFL that needs weeding out but how this can be done unless all clubs work together I don't know. It certainly is not just a Richmond thing as watching other matches, bias can be seen