the claw said:i disagree. and in a big way. hardwick imo should have little to do with recruiting or list management, a say yes.
i keep on saying it but the club should have a firm path in place to build the list after the review. they need to implement the processes to go down that path.after that review they should have a damn good idea of who has to go.
hardwick imo is just one small process in the plan. we had an all encompassing review why have it at all if it does not set out the strategy to build the club, and the processes needed to get there.
brown and coughlan were clearly washed up and had to go. no slight on either player both have been good players. it was not hardwicks decision to make. as a club we keep on putting all the eggs in one basket hardwick is not the messiah he has his job to do and the listmanager head of footy and recruiting officers have theirs. they should all be on the same page with the same brief of what is required. when will people understand.
Spot on claw.
As I posted a few weeks ago it had been reported that a number of list decision would be made before the appointment of the new coach.