Lynch !! | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Lynch !!

His comment about Lynch not being a real threat because he didn’t capitalise on all of his scoring opportunities is amusing; he’s forced himself to come across as ignorant of his understanding of the game just to suit his narrative.
He’s ignorant full stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
It's not even a fine-able offence yet he'll be fined to appease the media. Why should we pay?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
That was one of the best games Tom has ever played. Transformed our team completely.
Lays claim to being the best key forward in the comp.

Tom was playing on his home ground. Probably the first GCS Captain to play a final at Metricon.
 
Did something I normally don’t do, read the comments on FB , lol ffs flogs saying he should get life, 3 weeks, worst bloke in AFL, hope he gets injured and how protected the RFC is :)) But probably the best of them Long would have got weeks if it was him..
 
Jones getting fined for whacking Baker in the face?

Media going apes***?

Remind me again why Lynch should be hung, drawn and quartered for a little hello from his knee.

I don't like that he does this but I reckon the media beat-up is far more offensive, especially when a heap of other incidents are just ignored.

Look at the response to Dixon elbowing the Hawthorn player, most of the response was how they loved seeing him with his jumper off (who ever said there is no homo-eroticism in footy, of all codes?).

Maybe we should just respond the way the media does when one of the players they like does something like this: ooh he's tough, just what he does, great to see the game played on the edge etc ad nauseum.

Yet again the MRO has their agenda set by the media's faux outrage. Bunch of amateurs at the AFL being led on by a bunch of numpties in the media.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
So that’s it for the match review? Nothing on Cotchin?

The fine for Lynch is ridiculous but cop it and move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I can understand people saying he should pull his head in because he's been so much under the microscope, but he's been no worse, and probably a lot better than some other players such as Mummy, Hawkins & Dixon, yet these guys are often lauded for their hardness or toughness. And there are plenty of other snipers out there that fly under the radar too.

Lynch is the media's poster boy for thuggery stories. It helps selling papers or with click bait.

My view - keep it up big fella. We love ya! :)
Let's not forget Nat Fyfe. Weekly elbows to opposition players heads, quite often directly in front of the maggots and not one tint little bit of criticism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Let's not forget Nat Fyfe. Weekly elbows to opposition players heads, quite often directly in front of the maggots and not one tint little bit of criticism.
Tom Mitchell should have been suspended too in hos Brownlow year
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
So that’s it for the match review? Nothing on Cotchin?

The fine for Lynch is ridiculous but cop it and move on.

I almost fell out of my chair when McLachlan asked "does Cotchin have anything to worry about?". If we start fining or suspending for high tackles we may as well play basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
$750 fine on an early plea - reckon he should appeal as its not clear whether the saints player brought him to ground - worst result is the fine jumps to $1250.