Good on you, W !
But if Aarts is guilty of anything - and it's true that Collins is chasing after Lynch and only drops after the 'big hit' from Jake - why isn't he the culprit instead of Tom? Tom claimed an open hand but not sure if there is footage to clarify. Both impacts looked pretty minor to me; I mean for a huge, tough, hard-as-teak footballer. Don't suppose Collo went down looking for a free since Tom has definitely got away from him this time however it happened?
So you probably didn't send it to the AFL, right? Because they would have already examined the whole match forensically as they say they do, right? In order to impose and apportion for any perceived misdemeanors? Therefore, they have found ... and then dismissed this as a - 'no case to answer'? But surely the AFL cannot be such biased hypocrites to ignore this same offence? Surely? Or was it the reason why they backed away from the Lynch-mob by just a fine (and thinking no-one will notice how Collins got away with exactly the same thing?)
Remind me again why SEN banned you, W? [Surely not because they feature a heap of prejudiced, self-appointed moral arbiters who in no way have any credentials to occupy such high ground, and that includes their head honcho: Jabber Hutchi Poobah himself].
Thanks Leon.
The reason is because I called Robbo a ‘drunk and coherent ‘ when he was on SEN and use to annoy me the Richmond ‘hater’.
I know it was wrong!