And by a long wayPhar Ace said:NO! We are just legitimately the worst team in the competition.
And by a long wayPhar Ace said:NO! We are just legitimately the worst team in the competition.
Djevv said:At the start of the game they mentioned there was a 3 year average age difference and 50 games. That is a huge gulf. Add to that we have 2 senior players that are >25 and any good: Newman and Cousins. I think this is a fair excuse for poor performance myself.
thejinx said:What about last week? The age difference between us and Freo was marginal at best.
Djevv said:Against Freo at home? I thought we were OK. Anyway what do you call marginal? Also Freo have some class players - Hill, Pavlich and Sandilands (and probably few others I am forgetting).
I agree there is more to is than simply age and experience, we are paying for 10 years of recruiting and administrative mismanagement, but we must be realistic. Play a youth based side and you will get smashed on occasions.
cagedtiger said:After 6 rounds of footy all of of our new 17/18 year old recruits should be seasoned 100 games footballers by now - no excuses.
jamo said:LMFAO.
Nice one, I wonder how many people have actually read what you wrote :hihi
Its amazing isn't it, panic stations, no no no sack the coach I say, that will do it. (sarcasm is wonderful isn't it)
In answer to the initial question.
Yes youth is an excuse 6 rounds in Graystar.
thejinx said:No-one wants to sack the coach. But we've got a long, dark road ahead of us and things aren't going to magically get better just because our guys get older and more experienced.
Most of our problems at the moment have nothing to do with youth and inexperience.
jamo said:We have had a long dark road ahead of us since 2002.
What is the reason then?
I actually think we will be out of that tunnel alot sooner than you think. Only my opinion
jamo said:We have had a long dark road ahead of us since 2002.
What is the reason then?
I actually think we will be out of that tunnel alot sooner than you think. Only my opinion
jamo said:What is the reason then?
jamo said:I actually think we will be out of that tunnel alot sooner than you think. Only my opinion
tigers80 said:im more concerned about our next batch of experienced players like Lids,Tambling,Newman etc...
not so much as a whimper.
thejinx said:Last week I was looking at the age differences between Freo and Richmond, and the amount of players in each age bracket. There were extremely similar (I believe they had 2 more players in the 26-30 group which was the biggest discrepancy), so youth certainly couldn't have been used as an excuse last week.
Mr Richmond said:the differnce between north and us IMO is the experience players that support the youth, our experienced players as a whole are shizenhousen!
thejinx said:Laziness and not knowing what hard work really is.
Also our collective attitude. We don't seem to have the most competitive guys at the club. They're all too happy to pat each other on the back and high five each other when things are going to sh!t. I know a lot of people here are a fan of the positive reinforcement philosophy, and that works to a degree, but you look at Geelong a few years ago before they become a top line club and how that infamous meeting they had with each other changed their fortunes. They decided to draw a line in the sand and no longer accept mediocrity from each other and were straight down the line about each others deficiencies etc. Now look at where they are.
TigerForce said:Nason and Martin seem to be definites so far. I'm liking the way Nason roves and passes.
cagedtiger said:Lids topped the uncontested possession today and 4th on effective kicks. Newman topped effective kicks. Yes this includes Geelong players.
IrockZ said:Newman is the master of the 20m switch in the D50 which ends up being pointless.
Cant remember the last time he had an effective Inside 50.
Brodders17 said:ummm. no.
according to the H-Sin the age brackets went like this:
30+: freo- 0 tigers 2
25-29: freo- 10 tigers 3
20-24: freo- 8 tigers 12
<20: freo 4 tigers 5.