Mac said:This post has saved me starting a new thread, which I would have called Misguided Loyalty, which is somehting I have been accused of. My only response was along the lines of "Oh yeah? Is not. Says you." But I didn't have any real come back.
In hindsight it has been misguided loyalty. If the RFC was a stock, I would have dumped it years ago. If it was the local garage, I would have switched to someone who could actually fix my car. Not many other entities enjoy such a return of loyalty like a football club and no more so than the RFC. It is of course different to these analagies, because of the emotional and tribal attachment with a team - and it's usually virtually impossible to change for a true supporter once they've aligned themselves. I always held the utter belief and hope that one day they would repay me, not understanding the nature of how a good team works (when I was a kid I didn't understand why the players in my team wouldn't do the things the players in other teams were doing - now I understand it's because they couldn't). The RFC of course hasn't repaid me and doesn't look like doing so for some time still. And yet I remain loyal. Why? It's not like the rewards are abundant. Are they loyal to me? If I let my membership lapse for a year, would they embrace me back as a gold member? I'd have to make my case to them pretty good - they might do it. What if it lapsed for 3 to 5 years? No way known would they reinstate my gold status. What if they invested in me for 27 years and I let them down for all but 2 of those years? How loyal would they feel toward me?
I won't be changing teams, but I currently don't have that unshakable hope because I'm older and can understand they have to build/rebuild properly and if they don't they will continue to perform poorly - I'll just be more philosophical about it.
And let's face it. They have been and continue to be dumb. It was one thing to put Richo back on against the roos as a game day tactic, but it is inconceivable to me how they didn't rest him against the swans. I was astounded he was was even considered let alone named and played.
tigerjoe said:I ask you, could a club be any dumber than Richmond.
Poor draft picks,
crap game plan,
5 year contracts,
letting injured players continue to play,
poor administration,
etc, etc...................
And now Richo is out for 10 weeks because the medico's and coach let him play on Sunday.
Richmond you are a joke!
Baloo said:We've still got the best song in the world
RemoteTiger said:Not much good though - if you only ever hear the song before the game and never after the game.........
Baloo said:We've still got the best song in the world
RemoteTiger said:Add Richo's hamstring injury handling
To
Cousins having tightness in his hamstring and being put back on the field in round 1 when the game was all over - then his hamstring tears
IanG said:Except he didn't have tightness in his hamstring, it was unrelated.
Ghost of 29 said:And to the original question, every time the club has an option they more often than choose the wrong one..stupid or unlucky?
BloodOath said:I take it your NOT a member Hypoxic??
frawleyudud said:Don't be like that!!
How could they tell that Richo would have been injured??
The fact he hobbled off during the North game clutching his hammy??
The fact they sent him back on against North and he was limping??
The fact he limped from the first whistle against Sydney??
The fact they took him off against Sydney for almost a qtr??
The fact they brought him back on against Sydney when he clearly was struggling to walk let alone run??
Which one of those?? How could they know?? It was just plain unlucky!!!
[/quote
Spot on. I have been filthy at the club since that point in the North game. Our medicos and coaching staff are completely inept. Blind Freddy could see what was going to happen. They stuffed up with Cuz, now they have done the same to Richo. Joke of the highest order.