Yep, conditions were more favourable when he hit off, but it sure was a heck of a round.Ancer’s round was off the charts. Fantastic.
Yep, conditions were more favourable when he hit off, but it sure was a heck of a round.Ancer’s round was off the charts. Fantastic.
Well, you'll have to pull your socks up in the inaugural PRE Triple Bogey Cup then Miles Davis. Torrey Pines....Phil's home town. It's gonna be absolute bedlam. (Played that course and been to the pro shop/practice range a number of times over the years. Very average course for a US Open.)Things can only improve. I actually was better off once my hacks that missed the cut were cast off.
Looking forward to the US Open.
Phil is a lot more likeable now than 15 years ago. He appears to have a great sense of humour and perspective. Always fun to watch play. Loved watching him out drive Koepka on 16. Phil loved it too!
Very mega tough, only a dozen or so under par. The way that course wraps around the water reminded me of swan island down at queenscliffAmazing effort by Phil. His career as a top flight player at Tour level looked well and truly over then boom ! Jumps up out of nowhere and puts in a spectacular Phil of old performance.
Very ordinary rounds by Koepka and Oosthuizen. Mistakes galore. Missed fairways, missed putts. How did Koepka miss that 2 footer on 3 and the 6 and 8 footers on 10 and 11 by a mile? Oosthuizen hit his 8 iron into 13 into the water which must have been 40 yards right of the middle of the green. Amateur hack stuff there.
Mega tough course but a lot of unforced errors by the key chasers.
Very mega tough, only a dozen or so under par. The way that course wraps around the water reminded me of swan island down at queenscliff
Yeh, always heard he wasn't the most popular guy with his fellow pros (was it Mark Allen who always brought this up?) but the US crowds have always loved him. I've never been much of a fan but he appears to have a pretty good sense of humour. No doubting his ability, kinda like it when a guy who hits it sideways at times does well. Gives me hope. Sublime short game has obviously helped him.Interesting guy Phil. Few stories about him. Polarising guy.
Personally I don't mind seeing these guys challenged. They are the best of the best so bad shots should be punished. Different playing it as an amateur.I like the greatest golf architect ever, Alistair Mackenzie's approach - which is the exact opposite to Pete Dye's - and that is, a bad shot should not be punished by a severe penalty, rather it should require a great shot to recover from.
There's enough bland tournaments already with guys shooting 20+ under. To me it's a bit like the AFL and their obsession with scoring. Higher scores in footy/lower scores in golf isn't necessarily better. I like to see them tested.I cant understand golf architecture at times, or the way they prep for big events. Whats wrong the good guys shooting really low scores?
Its not as though the over 50s womens penant make RM west look like a goat track, so why not leave it alone and let everybody see how much better the pros really are.
Good point, I'll shut up now.There's enough bland tournaments already with guys shooting 20+ under. To me it's a bit like the AFL and their obsession with scoring. Higher scores in footy/lower scores in golf isn't necessarily better. I like to see them tested.
I reckon you know how much better the pros are when clubs have guys off +5 handicaps who barely make a cent on the pro-am or Australasian tour and are way off the touring pros.
I didn't mean it like that. Sometimes they make them too tricked up (some US open rough) that punish pretty good shots that is just stupid.Good point, I'll shut up now.
Not saying the new handicap system is good or bad , however it is incomparable to the old. I think I said earlier on this thread that there’s about 5 shots different imho . I know of 2 guys who both played Eisenhower cup , both played in majors and plus 1 would have been the lowest either one achieved before turning pro. One massive difference in ”true” low handicaps is the player that just plays at his home club and a player who plays state amateur tournaments, if they are the same handicap, the ”homey” is 5 shots lesser player.There's enough bland tournaments already with guys shooting 20+ under. To me it's a bit like the AFL and their obsession with scoring. Higher scores in footy/lower scores in golf isn't necessarily better. I like to see them tested.
I reckon you know how much better the pros are when clubs have guys off +5 handicaps who barely make a cent on the pro-am or Australasian tour and are way off the touring pros.
intrest couple of players to watch going forward , either one could end up with 10 majors or never win another.BDC = preppy, old money, whiney wanker. Never plays a bad shot. Always something or someone else’s fault.
Koepka = surly bogan who can barely raise a smile at anything.
Red or black on the roulette wheel of ego and unlikeability.
The clearing of scrub is a very good point , go back 30 years and you couldn’t miss a fairway on the sand belt without having to take a drop or chip out backwards if you found your ball, yep in the attempt to speed up play we’ve chainsawed so many courses , different topic but best way to fix slow play is don’t let local golfers watch the PGA tour .Agreed, I didn't play much golf for quite a few years and since coming back that's a big thing I've noticed.
Your handicap used to be more like your best score, you'd cop a whack for a good round and then only go out .1 for each round over the CCR. You could do a couple of shots on a good round and be 6 months or more going back.
Combine that with the club and ball technology, ability to measure distance exactly with range finders, tendency for courses to clear lots of low branches and scrub under the guise of 'speeding up play', and the general improvement in agronomy and I'd argue everyone is playing off 5 or more shots less than they would have 20 years ago.
A 4 handicapper used to be a gun, now you have blokes like me who are 8 markers on a good day getting to 1 or 2.
i wondered where u were going with thatAgreed, I didn't play much golf for quite a few years and since coming back that's a big thing I've noticed.
Your handicap used to be more like your best score, you'd cop a whack for a good round and then only go out .1 for each round over the CCR. You could do a couple of shots on a good round and be 6 months or more going back.
Combine that with the club and ball technology, ability to measure distance exactly with range finders, tendency for courses to clear lots of low branches and scrub under the guise of 'speeding up play', and the general improvement in agronomy and I'd argue everyone is playing off 5 or more shots less than they would have 20 years ago.
A 4 handicapper used to be a gun, now you have blokes like me who are 8 markers on a good day getting to 1 or 2.
Big Tiges fan too John.The clearing of scrub is a very good point , go back 30 years and you couldn’t miss a fairway on the sand belt without having to take a drop or chip out backwards if you found your ball, yep in the attempt to speed up play we’ve chainsawed so many courses , different topic but best way to fix slow play is don’t let local golfers watch the PGA tour .
Pretty sure when I played PK the other week that the trainee was on +6 or 7 , geez if your an old +6er you don’t bother with a trainee ship to learn how to sell Mars bars . I think John Wade used to be on about +6 at Vic many years back, state player who did ok in Europe I think, for memory Vic had a crazy ACR something around 75or 76 I think
From what I can gather it really favours the inconsitent golfer if the want to achieve a lower handicapThe “new” course and slope rating handicap system, used and forced upon the rest of the world by the USGA, of which I’m a member ( yes it’s all my fault), is absolute *smile*. A typically over engineered and confusing American application that fails on the practicality test. Miserably.
What is now a 2 handicap golfer used to be, a 5 handicapper under the old and better R&A system. I’ve just started playing comp golf again after a long lay off and I’m shocked at what some people are playing off.
I guess it’s all relevant, but anyway I’m hearing rumours of the R&A moving back to their old system despite the agreed WHS. I hope so.