tigerdave said:Thing's might get a little warmer if North Korea start pressing buttons.
I think its a nuclear winter dave. maybe it'll cancel out the warming and we'll have the perfect climate :don't know
tigerdave said:Thing's might get a little warmer if North Korea start pressing buttons.
tigergollywog said:I think its a nuclear winter dave. maybe it'll cancel out the warming and we'll have the perfect climate :don't know
tigertime2 said:the budget will reduce spending on Solar power by $100mil - I thought this was do or die? maybe the Marxist/warmest clique have more pressing issues - like trying to win an election...ah the reality of political life.
Liverpool said::fing32
tigergollywog said:I struggle to comprehend a thumbs up atdemocratic dysfunctionALP hypocrisy and potential global environmental catastrophe. Hows business Livsy?
Liverpool said:Just corrected the above for you
How's business you ask?
Ironically, I have just come out of a half year financial report meeting and the business has lost close to $15-million through the carbon tax alone and are seriously looking at relocating the manufacturing arm of the business.
I'm not in the manufacturing arm but I am sure, if we do re-locate this part of the business to China, that the manufacturing boys while lining up at Centrelink and wondering how they will pay their next mortgage repayment will feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing they have saved Australia from this global catastrophe
bullus_hit said:A true patriot you are, I guess you'll also be shipping jobs off to China if paid parental leave is introduced?
By the way, have you considered cutting energy costs as opposed to sacking workers?
bullus_hit said:A true patriot you are, I guess you'll also be shipping jobs off to China if paid parental leave is introduced?
By the way, have you considered cutting energy costs as opposed to sacking workers?
poppa x said:I could halve my energy costs but I'd have to produce half the goods with half the employees.
Worth thinking about though.
I'd be saving the planet to be better enjoyed by all the unemployed who'd be feeling a warm inner glow at their sacrifice.
poppa x said:I could halve my energy costs but I'd have to produce half the goods with half the employees.
Worth thinking about though.
I'd be saving the planet to be better enjoyed by all the unemployed who'd be feeling a warm inner glow at their sacrifice.
poppa x said:I could halve my energy costs but I'd have to produce half the goods with half the employees.
Worth thinking about though.
I'd be saving the planet to be better enjoyed by all the unemployed who'd be feeling a warm inner glow at their sacrifice.
Liverpool said:Just corrected the above for you
How's business you ask?
Ironically, I have just come out of a half year financial report meeting and the business has lost close to $15-million through the carbon tax alone and are seriously looking at relocating the manufacturing arm of the business.
I'm not in the manufacturing arm but I am sure, if we do re-locate this part of the business to China, that the manufacturing boys while lining up at Centrelink and wondering how they will pay their next mortgage repayment will feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing they have saved Australia from this global catastrophe
Liverpool said:Spot on Poppa.
Liverpool said:I assume you are talking about the Liberal Party's paid parental leave?
Let's see if that even gets off the ground considering the economic position this country will be in by the time a Liberal Government get back into power.
As for cutting energy costs....sure, we can do a number of things....one option the manufacturing arm looked at was the introduction of environmentally friendly and green efficient industrial lighting.
Unfortunately, at one site alone to change all the lighting over was going to be a major capex project and cost over $1-million.
It would cost tens of millions (even hundreds of millions) of dollars to rebuild or even change the processes we have to make it more 'green' and with commitments made to shareholders requiring a return, I doubt the company would go down this route or be even able to go down this route.
China does offer cheaper energy (both electricity, coal, and gas), cheaper labour, we have a high Australian dollar which isn't helping, now we have a $15-million carbon tax bill.
Thanks Julia :-* ...yet her union mates will be the first ones to get on TV spruiking about the poor workers losing their jobs
Oh well...at least they will have sunshine and fresh summer breezes here in Australia while all the bad chemicals and gases just hang around in China, right? :hihi
Spot on Poppa.
poppa x said:I could halve my energy costs but I'd have to produce half the goods with half the employees.
Worth thinking about though.
I'd be saving the planet to be better enjoyed by all the unemployed who'd be feeling a warm inner glow at their sacrifice.
Liverpool said:the business has lost close to $15-million through the carbon tax alone
Liverpool said:the business has lost close to $15-million through the carbon tax alone
bullus_hit said:So let's blame the carbon tax for all our woes, cop out of the highest order. Tony Abbott will repeal the carbon tax so why are people talking about relocating to China? I have a sneaking suspician that all this talk is just a great big ruse to avoid taking any responsibility for sacking Australian workers. At the end of the day, most businesses relocate off shore to cut costs, carbon tax or no carbon tax.
tigersnake said:Indeed. If you don't understand whats happening and what is required to start fixing it OR aren't concerned by climate change and the implications for future generations. Or to put it another way, don't know or don't care. Own it.
KnightersRevenge said:Typical, short-termism Livers. If industry made incremental upgrades over decades then you wouldn't need to discuss massive high cost projects. Instead plant is run to it's limit until it is no longer viable and you throw your arms up and say it's all too expensive lets move to China! This is precisely why "the market self-corrects" is the greatest snow job of all time. Companies push the limits of their output while short changing on maintenance and upgrades knowing full well that eventually the cap-ex won't be able to cover it...move somewhere else...rinse and repeat. It isn't about productivity and it isn't about WPR it is about greed, unsustainable practices and the illusion of infinite growth.
China won't be able to compete on low labour cost forever, what then? Tanzania? Why is profit a dirty word, not GROWTH mind, just profit. If I am making a profit every year why is that not considered good enough, why must my profit grow every year? This a mathematically fallacy. Growth cannot be sustained unless their is a brake on it somewhere. Recently the brake is a massive market meltdown. What does the market do? Rrinse and repeat! We will never learn.
tigergollywog said:That means its a dirty business.