Coaches votes
BRISBANE v RICHMOND
10 Daniel Rich (BL)
6 Charlie Cameron (BL)
6 Harris Andrews (BL)
6 Hugh McCluggage (BL)
2 Jarryd Lyons (BL)
cant argue with that.
Can’t think of 1 tiger who played well after half time.
Coaches votes
BRISBANE v RICHMOND
10 Daniel Rich (BL)
6 Charlie Cameron (BL)
6 Harris Andrews (BL)
6 Hugh McCluggage (BL)
2 Jarryd Lyons (BL)
Not one Tiger worthy of a vote out of 30 votes in a 15 point loss.
COVID Normal?We're not necessarily arguing opposite positions here.
With Lynch out we were really looking for a COVID normal style of game, not our ideal, but enough to get us by.
For me that COVID normal will have been based around accepting Andrews was going to be a very good player but to try and minimise his influence by restricting MOPs and forcing him to spoil.
Chol's job will have been to try and engage him as much as possible to prevent MOPs and get us forward stoppage by making him bring the ball to ground or to the boundary.
So I think every time he punched the ball away we would have considered it a win. We wouldn't with Lynch but in COVID normal it was ok. My verdict of Chol being ok, is based around Andrew's playing a very good game but not taking huge MOP numbers. I think we would have considered that break even before the game and I suspect Hardwick only gave him 2 votes because of it.
I'd be interested to hear the coaches analysis but my take is we executed our COVID normal ok to the point where the ball was brought to ground but we failed to back it up by winning the forward 50 contested ball at the subsequent contests and stoppages.
Could Hardwick be part of the AFL/Umpires/Media Richmond hate club?
It’s probably fair enough in this instance. Can’t think of any Richmond players that played better than those Brisbane players. Dusty was great in first half but virtually unsighted after half time.Not one Tiger worthy of a vote out of 30 votes in a 15 point loss.
I hadn’t thought of it but now that you mention it.....Could Hardwick be part of the AFL/Umpires/Media Richmond hate club?
I know that sometimes sides can appear as if they aren’t giving 100% due to opposition pressure and tactics preventing them from playing the way they would like; and I’m unsure if that was the case on Friday night or not, however to my eyes there appeared to be a marked drop off with 5 minutes to go in the 2bd qtr, after which the Tiges weren’t the same.
Didn't expect Dimma to give any of his players a voteCoaches votes
BRISBANE v RICHMOND
10 Daniel Rich (BL)
6 Charlie Cameron (BL)
6 Harris Andrews (BL)
6 Hugh McCluggage (BL)
2 Jarryd Lyons (BL)
cant argue with that.
Can’t think of 1 tiger who played well after half time.
Short was on Cameron for that one. Grimes was on the bench. For his other goal where raynor gave him the assist, grimes actually left him to provide a spoil but didn't kill the contest and cameron got free.
There's an enormous amount of complete garbage being written in this thread I'm afraid, and this is a snapshot of some of it.
Firstly, the scoreboard didn't flatter us by any definition. Lost by 15 points and gave away two goals by acting like dickheads.
We also went at 29% forward efficiency. As a comparison, the day we played Sydney we went at 30%. The last time we played Brisbane we had 5 less inside 50s and scored 82 points, at 48% efficiency. Brisbane's figures were essentially the same when you balance the goal kicking accuracy.
As for the guys you allege were a mistake playing, let's have a look at that. There is no comparison to 2018 because taking players in with injury/health concerns is completely different to playing healthy players who haven't had the game time.
Then the specifc, Astbury was more than serviceable neutralising contests, Prestia was clearly in our best few players. If you think he was a liability I'm suggesting you watch the game again. Especially when you suggest Nankervis should have gone forward to help Riewoldt but it seemed to me he spent plenty of time forward and was hardly on the bench. Nankervis did what he does every week, busted his arse against the odds and Houli and Edwards were a bit down but hardly awful.
And out of the guys you have named who would you have played instead? Broad for Astbury is hardly like for like, Garthwaite? Do you think Ross would have had the 20 touches Prestia got and been in our best? And who the hell plays instead of Nankervis? Eggmolesse-Smith for Houli? Higgins for Edwards? I can't see how anyone would suggest any of those moves makes us a better side.
As for Chol, he is copping a hiding but I wonder how many people have considered the role he was asked to play? I'll wager plenty that the coaches asked him to concentrate on negating Andrew's ability to intercept mark and to even contests and I thought he did ok at. There was a moment in the second quarter when he was one on one and could have led but you can see him wanting to stay with Andrews as well and do his job, so he gets stuck in nowhere.
There was another moment in the last quarter where he was beaten and you could see he was emotional. It was a shame he didn't clunk the early mark and kick a goal to give him a boost, he's a young bloke finding his way on the best defender in the competition. He certainly showed a heck of a lot more heart and go than lots of the so-called supporters laying the boots into him.
Who was the HF on Rich, allowing him to land 10 coaches votes.
In the 2019 Q final, i watched Rioli get humiated by Rich in the first quarter. He responded,
But someone didnt respond on friday.
Alarm bells screamed in my head when Rich kicked the opener. Someone was being very very unaccountable and theres a decent chance that someone kicked *smile* all goals as well
While on inadequacy,
I know 1:1 defensive work isnt Shortys strength, but letting Charlie Cameron waltz through at that fwd stoppage and kick a goal was woefully inadequate.
Surely playing to your strength doesnt mean trying to gain 60m, while your opponent does as he pleases at a stoppage near goal?
Someone was asleep & accountable there.From what I could tell it was Lambert. Has had a shocking season amd deserves to be dropped.
Short was blocked, if we are going to blame someone, prob Cotch. His man blocked Short, but he let Cameron go straight past him.While on inadequacy,
I know 1:1 defensive work isnt Shortys strength, but letting Charlie Cameron waltz through at that fwd stoppage and kick a goal was woefully inadequate.
Surely playing to your strength doesnt mean trying to gain 60m, while your opponent does as he pleases at a stoppage near goal?
I think the comes from employing zones, especially at the start, where no one really has RIch as there opponent. I would put that down to a collective failure of defence, rather than trying to pin it on 1 player.Alarm bells screamed in my head when Rich kicked the opener. Someone was being very very unaccountable and theres a decent chance that someone kicked *smile* all goals as well