I thought there was a sort of gentlemans agreement to not draft Acadamy players,
Especially the long term development boys?
Dog eat dog out there.
Some clubs haven't seen success since Lazarus was around.
I thought there was a sort of gentlemans agreement to not draft Acadamy players,
Especially the long term development boys?
Geelong got a A for drafting.
Despite picking up a player who was more likely a rookie pick.
Wells thinks his **** dosent stink.
People forget the duds he has picked
Tennace
Menzel
Smedlts
Thurlow
Lang
Buzza
Smedts was standout bad but even he got a chance at another club. Not too bad if they're the worst of the worst. Not surprised Buzza has been snapped up.
Robertson and bianco look classy in their highlights packages but I can see why we overlooked them. We put a premium on what a player can do without the ball. We look at run, intensity, pressure, repeat efforts. Full court press. There's a chapter in stronger and bolder called position over possession. Lambert never got picked in a draft but is one of our most important to how we play. Most would have picked Menzel over Castagna.
Wells thinks his **** dosent stink.
People forget the duds he has picked
Tennace
Menzel
Smedlts
Thurlow
Lang
Buzza
Most clubs want to commit to players long term. The rookie list doesn’t work any more because players have to be discarded and relisted after three years.So the rookie draft has morphed into the “relisted” draft with 17 of the 33 picks being delisted players. Also 3 recycled players. So just 13 genuine rookies Were drafted.
Yeah, it’s all a bit circular. Decades ago lists were 50+ then slowly got cut down but now with the rookie players lists are what, 45? So if we just had larger lists after a short time clubs would say “we need a list where we can add untried young players” and then a rookie list would be reintroduced. And on it goes....Most clubs want to commit to players long term. The rookie list doesn’t work any more because players have to be discarded and relisted after three years.
Initially, the rookie list was designed for a couple of younger emergency players. It has been repurposed too many times. The primary list should just be longer.
Yeah, it’s all a bit circular. Decades ago lists were 50+ then slowly got cut down but now with the rookie players lists are what, 45? So if we just had larger lists after a short time clubs would say “we need a list where we can add untried young players” and then a rookie list would be reintroduced. And on it goes....
So is our list completed now? I've read a few articles which talk nothing about us using the supplimentary selection process.
I had thought we'd use it to bring Sam Murray onto the list, assume he makes it through preseason training. But the articles haven't discussed RFC as a
club that is in a position to do this. The list had 6-7 clubs on it, no Tigers. Melbourne has space for 2 for example.
Heard on the grapevine that the Bris academy boys are both considered pure minds by industry boffins. Scoop should be happy
Will Martyn in particular looks like he could be very dangerous outside as well. Quite impressed actually. Clearly at the state team level they weren't getting the inside midfield duties that other more fancied players were getting.