gutfull said:What a load of tripe to compare the Bali situation with the others you mentioned @!!
care to explain how that is tripe? 2 x drug smugglers got the death penalty while all those multiple murderers don't. how is that fair?
gutfull said:What a load of tripe to compare the Bali situation with the others you mentioned @!!
Ian4 said:care to explain how that is tripe? 2 x drug smugglers got the death penalty while all those multiple murderers don't. how is that fair?
Ian4 said:care to explain how that is tripe? 2 x drug smugglers got the death penalty while all those multiple murderers don't. how is that fair?
Ian4 said:so those arguing against the death penalty are against the bali bombers being executed? what about Martin Bryant? Julian Knight? Peter Dupas? Bandali Debs? ...
Baloo said:I'm not telling anyone how to run their country/life/club. But I also understand those that are taking up the fight.
Sadly, to me, at one stage back their I thought Bishop had actually managed to give Indonesia a way out without losing face. Bishop and her team seemed to be doing some good work. But the second Abbott mentioned the Tsunami Aid money, that was it, he pretty much ensured that the 2 Aussies would be executed.
AMPS said:Don't agree with the "ït's Abbotts fault" line. He was in a no win situation, and the biased will seize another opportunity to lay the boots in.
Whilst I disagree with a lot of his policies and actions and he has a propensity to stick his foot in it I can't stand the overreaction to all things that come out of his mouth
Baloo said:I think you need to tread what I said. It's his duty as PM to protest, appeal and try to stop the murder. But the minute he invoked Tsunami Aid, and the threat of it, he lost any chance of giving the Indonesians a way to back track without losing face.
If you cant see how stupid and naïve Abbott was to use Aid as a threat, you can't have had many dealings in Asia.
Baloo said:This is where I am conflicted. I do think that people should accept the laws of foreign countries and if they break them, be prepared for the consequences.
But then I think of countries like SA where in our life time they had signs that said "No Blacks Allowed". Should we just sit back and allow it to happen ?
I said, quite clearly, when Abbott decided to use Aid as a threat, he stopped any chance there was of a diplomatic solution. Whether we would have got one or not without his "Aid" reference is in no way certain and it probably wouldn't have worked in the end, but he certainly brought it to a head quickly. It put an end to the efforts of Bishop who was reading the situation correctly or at least was listening to her advisers.AMPS said:You essentially blamed Abbott for the executions, what proof do you have, other than your own experience, that his comments made it impossible for a pardon to ensue?
Baloo said:I said, quite clearly, when Abbott decided to use Aid as a threat, he stopped any chance there was of a diplomatic solution. Whether we would have got one or not without his "Aid" reference is in no way certain and it probably wouldn't have worked in the end, but he certainly brought it to a head quickly. It put an end to the efforts of Bishop who was reading the situation correctly or at least was listening to her advisers.
My own experience, which is the experience of living and doing business in SE Asia for 18 years, is more than enough I reckon. But if you want more, I have as part of my circle of acquaintances(drinking buddies) here people who work in embassies, foreign correspondents who work for major news agencies out here and others who do business in this region. All of them felt the same sense of finality when Abbott started with the Aid.
AMPS said:Fair enough, but the cynic in me thinks it another opportunity to bag abbott. Whether his comments ended the pardon chances is now moot.
Baloo said:Really, if someone is intent on bagging Abbott, they don't need to make things up.
AMPS said:Whilst he makes many unfortunate statements the outrage over his St Pats day comment, the sh!t happens comment and the skolling the beer show to some he will never do anything right. In some ways he is just getting his own back for the relentless attacks on Gillard and Rudd but who is going to rise above it?
rosy23 said:Amps do you think, with hindsight, that Tony would make that aid comment again? Do you think it did the cause any favours? You can fly the Abbott flag here and point out his lack of general support but in reality it's one particular comment that is being discussed.