Comparing the Clarkson era and Hardwick era should include list dynamics.
Clarkson had the advantage of staying on top while 2 new clubs sucked up draft picks limiting the ability for opposition teams to build a list to compete at the pointy end. The Hawks recruited specific established players from opposition clubs. As a result they aged, and toppled over the cliff.
To Hardwick's credit, he's managed to build a list despite the limitations inflicted by two new clubs entering the competition right as we bottomed out. Instead, the club built the off field team virtually impeccably, footy dept and business dept. We struck gold very late in drafts, and added these players to a core of emerging champions. We've now manipulated a draft hand to go again with a rejuvinated list. As old as our champions seemed to be in 2021, i think the very short break was their cryptonite. Coltchin for example is only 31. He's not 34. I think these guys could come back bigger and better, whilt we get more development into kids. Short of falling off the cliff in the next year or two, we should at a minimum be very competative, bearing in mind as the champs retire, we can pick up a few free agent gems to slot in with the, hopefully by then, developed new talent.
We could be competing for flags with a new breed well into this decade, with Dimma still sitting at the helm.
In relation to the departure of assistants, it is more likely a reflection of the club as an organisation putting things in place to make people better to broaden their opportunities to fullfil their ambitions. The weaknesses of Kent Kingsley that cost him a gig this year, are being addressed in his role by the club going forward. It keeps everyone motivated and new ideas flowing through the organisation.
Years ago whilst running a dept in the city, i delegated at every opportunity. I was as careful as i could be in selecting what i delegated to whome, and i always encouraged them to apply for other positions within the organisation. It wasn't that i wanted to lose good staff, but i didn't want the natural progression within my department to stagnate. If nobody moves on or up, what can staff under them aspire to?
That was going back quite a while now, and the corporate environment has changed significantly, and to the point where dealing with such people gets up my goat, hence the fact that most of my income now simply comes from logging into a computer at night and dragging money out of the US stock exchange. No dealing with idiots. and a clean desk with no paperwork.