a litany of desperate diversions. don't be so sensitive.
i say again - your logic that we shouldn't apply heavy training loads against the bottom team because we are "desperate" is pretty dumb.
ps. our injuries are manageable. we are the ultimate system-based side. how have you not noticed this over the years?
It’s not sensitive to find your posts aggravating. They are intentionally antagonistic. Maybe you should reflect on why so many people respond so negatively to your insult littered posts. You are allowed to disagree with someone without calling them dumb, desperate, blind, or saying they don’t watch the game.
Without all the garbage, you would be a genuinely interesting poster to discuss the footy with.
As for your one point out of several problems with the ’heavy training load explains everything’ hypothesis. IF we have been in a heavy training phase (which still seems to be a fiction borne our of a supposition), then we have stuffed it up. Our outs (although Dusty and Lynch instantly make us a 4 or 5 goal better side) are not too bad right now, but against Goldy, they were horrendous. Probably not the week to flog them on the track.
Especially when you’re barely hanging on to the eight. And if the suggestion is that we had a system/plan in place that we couldn’t change, well, that’s also something that could be improved. System is good. Inflexible is bad.
Timing aside, if we are supposedly training so heavily that our players are functionally incapacitated during games, that would also be a stuff up. Whether or not you’re playing North. Heavy training loads should mean heavy legs, not a complete inability to function.
None of that really matters anyway, if we have been training normally, which is still entirely possible. It’s all a bit of a hypothetical regardless.