Hardly surprising what he is saying.
The Australian bowlers in the game would care to disagree.
He has smeared their reputation without any proof.
Hardly surprising what he is saying.
You think the bowlers were thinking the ball was being excessively shined and roughed up by magic?The Australian bowlers in the game would care to disagree.
He has smeared their reputation without any proof.
The Kiwis are an impressive unit. No Williamson, no Southee, no Watling, no worries. Ok, the Poms have no Stokes or Archer, but the gulf in batting techniques is vast. If Dom Sibley's a Test opener I'm a mezzo soprano.
You cannot be serious.The Poms having no Archer is a benefit to England IMO.
You cannot be serious.
Fair enough. Reckon he'll be more of a factor out here than Anderson - who never has been, day/night Tests aside.Jofra Archer? Yep. Great pace but a flat track bully for mine. Lacks the endurance and perseverance, not to mention being mentality fragile, when bowling conditions don't suit him.
When the conditions suit him he is dangerous. But when they don't a liability.
His performance is too hinged on the efforts of others, namely Anderson and Broad.
Australia are *smile* at T20 cricket.
Dan Christian isn't the answer.Our selections are just *smile* up.
Dan Christian isn't the answer.