So you don't see any potential bias in that article? Who wrote it and why? Who are the 47 economists and what are their biases?
You can read articles by Gigi Foster that will argue the opposite.
Stop this human sacrifice: the case against lockdowns
Governments must consider the total welfare of their people when contemplating action as drastic as a lockdown. An economist argues the NSW government has not demonstrated that the benefits outweigh the costs.www.smh.com.au
I'm sure I could find a stack of other articles by qualified economists arguing against the lockdowns and the cost of them.
Its kinda moot really, we can't change it.
I reckon there's a wealth of PhD topics in this for the next 20 years.
One thing is for sure, diminishing returns in lockdowns as the % of vaxxed people grows.