COVID is scared of catching a case of Revs.So, no Revs then?
COVID is scared of catching a case of Revs.So, no Revs then?
Such a superior deaf n blind personage. Why the *smile* do you insist on continually chanting your anti vax lies? What benefits are there in a year of unnecessary lock downs, *smile* mask laws shattered businesses n a crippled economy?
Might need to be careful you don't stand too close behind old mate Dan, if he bends over a bit quick you both might get an unexpected surprise.
Fully vaxxed people are far less likely to catch COVID and it’s pretty hard to spread it if you don’t have it.Fully vaxxed people are just as capable of spreading the infection as non vaxxed.
What is far-less likely though? The UK experience is starting to show similar numbers to pre-vaccine days. I understand restrictions were in place but I think far less likely is not really correct. Severity of illness is reduced but catching and spreading is still occurring.Fully vaxxed people are far less likely to catch COVID and it’s pretty hard to spread it if you don’t have it.
It is likely that fully vaxxed people with COVID are leas likely to spread it as well but the research is not out on that yet.
Fully vaxxed people are far less likely to catch COVID and it’s pretty hard to spread it if you don’t have it.
It is likely that fully vaxxed people with COVID are leas likely to spread it as well but the research is not out on that yet.
What is far-less likely though? The UK experience is starting to show similar numbers to pre-vaccine days. I understand restrictions were in place but I think far less likely is not really correct. Severity of illness is reduced but catching and spreading is still occurring.
I think there has to be some education around this, they should be highlighting that vaccinated or not you if you put yourself in high-risk spots (indoors/poor ventilation/high density) you won't be protected by a vaccine. And whilst you may not end up in hospital, that older more vulnerable or unvaccinated person can still catch it from you.
What benefits are there in a year of unnecessary lock downs, *smile* mask laws shattered businesses n a crippled economy?
The latest information from the CDC in the US is that a fully vaccinated person is 8 times less likely to get COVID and 25 times less likely to be hospitalisedWhat is far-less likely though? The UK experience is starting to show similar numbers to pre-vaccine days. I understand restrictions were in place but I think far less likely is not really correct. Severity of illness is reduced but catching and spreading is still occurring.
What benefits are there in a year of unnecessary lock downs, *smile* mask laws shattered businesses n a crippled economy?
The Tobin brothers disagree.Evidence is the economy would be worse off without lockdowns.
I think Dan Murphy benefited from the lockdowns.And Dan Murphy’s.
Yes, true. But think of all the wakes.I think Dan Murphy benefited from the lockdowns.
The Tobin brothers would likely have been booming if there were no lockdowns.
Fair enough, wakes would have been a big thing without the lock-downs.Yes, true. But think of all the wakes.
Whoooooa ! Gold there BAT 78 ! Good work…Fair enough, wakes would have been a big thing without the lock-downs.
They would have been so popular, people would have been dying to get involved.
For an island country with comparatively barely any cooties to the rest of the world. We got way more cases than any other state in the country, per capita of population. Waaaaayyyy more deaths per capita. Way bigger outbreaks from our hotel quarantine system per capita n we somehow managed to set a world record for period of time in lock down. Obviously you n old mate Dan had the perfect system for dealing with the cooties. Pity you all forgot who was doing what whenever.All I've seen from you the whole pandemic is "they are all doing it wrong". And I'm the blind and superior one?
Yep wearing masks while sitting in your car driving to nowhere, or walking through a park, or sitting on the beach counting seagulls was going to stop you getting sick.Gee, what are the benefits?
Let me think . . . oh, that's right, a hell of a lot less people getting sick and dying.
If we didn't have the restrictions such as masks and lockdowns, more people would have died of COVID in Australia, like they have overseas.
If that was the case, would you have been willing to be one of the dead?
DS
Pretty damn sure we were getting lock downs way faster longer n more wide spread than every other state in the country n guess what. We've got by far the worst record of cases n deaths. Happy to bet my left one that the N.S.W. economy hasn't been whacked anywhere near as badly as ours has these last 18 months.Evidence is the economy would be worse off without lockdowns. And you're ignoring the fact that every single state has had lockdowns when the numbers get too much not just Vic.
Pretty damn sure we were getting lock downs way faster longer n more wide spread than every other state in the country n guess what. We've got by far the worst record of cases n deaths. Happy to bet my left one that the N.S.W. economy hasn't been whacked anywhere near as badly as ours has these last 18 months.
The only thing that's supported the economies to any degree is the Feds blowing up the budget throwing around money like confetti so people could play online shopping.
As for them bush fires, pretty sure there was a shitload of bbq happening in the bush around that area before they let thousands of peanuts all go touristing down there. Perhaps they'd have been a *smile* load smarter to not let them into the area in the first place as there's basically one road through that region. A wind shift was guaranteed to *smile* a lot of people over n even Janes Bunns could have told them where the wind was gunna be coming from.
There's reasons that the states services spend millions to have emergency plans n training systems for things like bush fires n pandemics n they're not for politicians n department heads to ignore n use as arse wipe.