Yeh, don't you love the principals comments - he believed there had been a misunderstanding that led to the family sending their child to school. "We're not trying to find a fault in this one, " he said. "the best thing is to see what we can do from now on."Mandatory detention is the only answer IMO. But the VIC authorities won't have the balls, especially if there are supposed cultural sensitivities. Much easier to fine people walking in the open air with out a mask.
Cultural issues and language barriers are certainly no longer valid. It's been 7 months now; anyone who uses that excuse is a *smile* liar. Now it is just down to ignorance, selfishness and being a *smile* *smile*.
Seriously? Say that to the 000's of businesses that have been shut down for 3 months.
And what about the comments from the VIC commander of testing and community engagement - Jeroen Weimar
Mr Weimar also said the boy's family had misunderstood who needed to remain in isolation after some members of the household were cleared of the virus.
"We have a household with a significant number of family members in the household. They have ... all gone through a positive cycle at some point, it dates back to at least over two weeks now. During a period of time, individual members of that household would have been given a very direct communication about their individual status and about whether they are due to have a day-three test, a day-11 test and at what point they are being released from quarantine.
Victoria’s commander of testing and community engagement Jeroen Weimar.CREDIT:JOE ARMAO
"My assessment of that situation is there were a number of people who were released from their quarantine period, having no longer being infectious, but other members of the household were still defined as close contacts and had not yet tested positive. One of the members of that household did attend school on the Monday and Tuesday, he had his day-11 test and that was positive."
A new contact tracing approach as large families pose challenges
Mr Weimar said the situation had prompted authorities to move towards a whole household case management approach, rather than dealing with cases individually."We are progressively moving more towards a case management approach where we group households together and say, how do we manage you as a family unit, or a household unit. That work is starting in some parts of our state and we will accelerate that as we go forward," he said.
Surely a whole household case management approach should have been the only way to go from the start?