Surely you don't take that seriously? Too much Dan Brown methinks.
10 minutes of my time lost. I was waiting for him to get to a categorical statement in his argument. Never happened.
Surely you don't take that seriously? Too much Dan Brown methinks.
This is just horrific. Surely Trump doesn't get out of this without repercussions.
View attachment 9720
View attachment 9721
View attachment 9722
He's been on the phone with Sean Hannity @ fox news today. ... lucky he can't go to the studio coz it'd be Xrated as they lick each other all over.Trump will say the modelling predicted a million deaths and because the figure was less than that he did a great job.
They have no reason to BS. Remember the China lock down was severe. People weren't allowed out of their house even for groceries. They locked down harder than any other country can. With a 2 week incubation, you can kill this virus if you suffocate it's ability to spread. Now they just need to protect their borders.
This is just horrific. Surely Trump doesn't get out of this without repercussions.
Trump will say the modelling predicted a million deaths and because the figure was less than that he did a great job.
Seems a pointless question to me as the majority of the physicians questioned would not have applied hydroxychloroquine to COVID-19 patients to make a valued judgement. They (37%) may believe that it has the best potential but how much of that would be influenced by the fact that it has been discussed the most by Trump and in media? Fauci doesn't believe it should be used at the present time. He like many believe that proper trials need to be conducted first to gauge benefits and ramifications of what is quite a dangerous drug.
Isnt America meant to be 're-opening' by Easter?Trump will say the modelling predicted a million deaths and because the figure was less than that he did a great job.
They have no reason to BS. Remember the China lock down was severe. People weren't allowed out of their house even for groceries. They locked down harder than any other country can. With a 2 week incubation, you can kill this virus if you suffocate it's ability to spread. Now they just need to protect their borders.
How is Sweden tracking?
Nearly a million 'mild' cases but they haven't recovered? That seems a bit whack.
I don't trust the numbers out of China either but I also agree with Baloo in a way that there s no reason to fudge them now.I don't really trust the numbers coming out of China, they seem too good to be true. Certainly China has locked down and slowed the spread effectively. But no more deaths? Hmm.
The real issue for China now is what next? How much do they open up their cities and rural areas, and how and when do they open their borders? This is almost unanswerable.
That said, I don't fully trust the US figures either as I suspect that not only are they not testing enough people, but that the testing is going to be skewed towards those who can afford testing. In the US I very much doubt the poor are being tested at anywhere near the rate which would give us meaningful numbers.
DS
Malaria Drug Helps Virus Patients Improve, in Small Study
People are making claims about a lot of established drugs.
That particular study was conducted on mildly ill patients. Considering the potential side-effects I don't think personally this will be the target audience. Bottom line is unless it can be shown in proper clinical trials to have a measurable benefit it's not going to be whisked out for mass use (as it shouldn't).
Looks like it will be used in Australia outside clinical trials but here are some other views (seen lots of these too):
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...nore-hydroxychloroquine-side-effects-n1178776
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...be-given-to-coronavirus-patients-in-australia
The virus is still present, so how are they preventing it from spreading?
You don't stop an epidemic like this in its tracks, especially when you're at the epicentre of the outbreak with a population of 1.4 billion.