mj72 said:As high as 10? I know the chimp is good but...
Haha. That's what happens when you try and post at work when your under the pump. Should read as high as 7.
mj72 said:As high as 10? I know the chimp is good but...
Tiger Rob said:By my reckoning Chimp would be on 5 Brownlow votes based on the coaches votes - a 3, a 1 and a 1. But the umpires love him, so could be as high as 10 Brownlow votes.
GoodOne said:If Judd can get 10 votes in 3 games so can Chimp.
TOT70 said:Cotch is going to get more votes this season than Julia gets in the election.
Brodders17 said:Richmond vs Collingwood
10 Cloke (Coll)
8 Sidebottom (Coll)
6 Swan (Coll)
3 Lynch (Coll)
2 O'Brien (Coll)
1 Hudson (Coll)
http://puntroadend.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=47959.msg1560623#msg1560623Tigermad2005 said:Just wondering who got them last week?
GoodOne said:Surely they didn't have 6 players better than our best. It was really only 15 minutes of footy that they blew us away. Guess it's still only an opinion.
Brodders17 said:Richmond vs Collingwood
10 Cloke (Coll)
8 Sidebottom (Coll)
6 Swan (Coll)
3 Lynch (Coll)
2 O'Brien (Coll)
1 Hudson (Coll)
Reckon Conca was our best. Was he worth a vote? I don't know. Do coaches sometimes play ducks and drakes with their voting? I reckon they do and I reckon Hardwick was sending a message he was pretty strong in his presser not looking for positives Frawley style.zippadeee said:Which player of us worthy of half a vote let alone 2 or 3 votes.
Pettard? Edwards? Deledio? Cotchin? Rance? Knights??
KnightersRevenge said:Reckon Conca was our best. Was he worth a vote? I don't know. Do coaches sometimes play ducks and drakes with their voting? I reckon they do and I reckon Hardwick was sending a message he was pretty strong in his presser not looking for positives Frawley style.
zippadeee said:Which player of us worthy of half a vote let alone 2 or 3 votes.
Pettard? Edwards? Deledio? Cotchin? Rance? Knights??
GoodOne said:Deledio or Reiwoldt in my opinion were arguably better than Lynch, O'Brien or Hudson.
zippadeee said:Were you watching the right game last week against collingwood,
Dyer'ere said:Fremantle vs Richmond
9 McPharlin (Frem)
8 Griffin (Frem)
5 Vickery (Rich)
4 Ballantyne (Frem)
2 Martin (Rich)
1 Ellis (Rich)
1 Knights (Rich)
To have a stab-
Coach A Coach B
5 - Griffin 5 - McPharlin
4 - Ballantyne 4 - Griffin
3 - McPharlin 3 - Vickery
2 - Vickery 2 - Martin
1 - Knights 1 - Ellis
You can switch the italicised votes. Coach A's vates are guesstimated to be based on a preference for goal-kickers in a game where they were hard to score. But the 1 votes can be switched.
IMO Griffin was clearly BOG.